Skip to main content

Objective 1 - the response from the Assembly

Last week, I produced a paper on the use of European funds in Wales under the Objective 1 programme. This research – based on the Assembly’s own data - showed that half of the counties in Wales had lost out under the programme and there had been an unfair allocation of funding across the Objective 1 region. It went on to propose that there should a greater focus on ensuring that every county within West Wales and the Valleys gets its fair share of funding to ensure greater prosperity across the whole region rather than in some counties.

I had hoped that, having spent a considerable amount of my spare time on this research, that the detailed analysis would trigger a meaningful debate on the use of European funds and, more importantly, would enable policymakers to critically re-examine the approach to the next round of £1.3 billion in raising prosperity within our poorest counties. Instead, the response of the Assembly Government was to dismiss any discussion and to fall back on their spin doctors to tell a completely different tale which bore little resemblance to addressing the real facts about this issue.

Let me share some of the Assembly’s response to my research with you, as it is certainly worth reading as a lesson for all aspiring public affairs spin doctors.

First of all, they stated that "Our successful management of European Funding has already ensured that Welsh national income has broken the £40 billion barrier - over ten billion pounds more than in 1999 when the National Assembly was set up”.

Whilst this is true, what they forget to say was that the actual difference between the poorest and richest parts of Wales has actually increased since 1999, despite the hundreds of millions of additional pounds of funding being spent by Objective 1. The latest statistics show that in West Wales and the Wales, the proportion of ‘national income’ rose by 26.1 per cent. In contrast, East Wales – which does not get Objective 1 funds – grew by 31.3 per cent. T

his clearly shows that the current approach to the ‘successful management’ of the Objective 1 programme has not closed the gap in prosperity between the poorest and richest areas of Wales. Indeed, prosperity per head in the Gwent Valleys has gone down from 63 per cent to 58 per cent of the UK average and Bridgend/Neath Port Talbot from 74 per cent to 64 per cent.

Secondly, the Assembly claimed that it has helped thousands more people into work and, given the hundreds of millions spent, it would be a surprise if this was not case. However, an independent evaluation of the Objective 1 programme indicated that it is unlikely to achieve the original employment target of 43,500 additional jobs and will have created between 26,000 and 40,500 net additional new jobs by the end of its life.

Indeed, for the 12 months ending in June 2006, the average employment level in West Wales and the Valleys was unchanged from the previous year. For East Wales, the level was 3,000 higher. Devolution was about returning power to the people of Wales and yet, in terms of economic development policies, there is a creeping centralisation where the Assembly and its highly paid civil servants know best.

Naively, I had hoped for a full and frank debate on this matter, not a dismissal of the facts as ‘parochial issues’ and ‘impractical’. For many people in the poorest parts of Wales, getting the amounts of funding they deserve for projects to improve the prosperity within their local communities is certainly not a parochial or an impractical issue and demonstrates how out of touch part of our devolved administration has become.

Many people believe that it is no longer acceptable that parts of Wales which should, by right, be getting millions in additional funding are, instead, losing out. The challenge for the next Assembly Government is to ensure that all the counties within West Wales and the Valleys get their fair share of the £1.3 billion of new European structural funds.

I hope that every politician will take this matter far seriously than the Assembly’s spin doctors and fight to ensure that no part of our economy is left behind in this drive to create a more prosperous Wales.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The Labour Party in Wales is not by it's nature business friendly. If we can't support Welsh enterpenours within the Objective 1 regions what chance is their for the GDP to go up!!

Ireland understood the importance of partnership with business while planning the structural funding. This Assembly Government does not have the experience and knowledge to make a difference!
You are right in some respects but the business expertise and experience is out there if only civil servants and politicians would stop their anally retneive behaviour and actually go looking for the help that welsh entrepreneurs are more than willing to provide.

Popular posts from this blog

THE CRACHACH

Unlike me, do you consider yourself part of 'the establishment' here in Wales?  As thousands gather for the Eisteddfod in Mold this morning, they will, according to some social commentators, not be participating in the greatest cultural festivals of Europe. Instead, they will merely be bit-part players in one of the annual gatherings of the great and good of Wales.  Unkindly, this set of the movers and shakers in Welsh society is known as 'the crachach' , and constitute a social class all of their own, dominating the educational, cultural and media sectors of Wales and allegedly looking down upon any outsider with new ideas, reinforcing mediocrity and failing to see beyond the limits of their own narrow experience.  They are said to live in a comfort zone that awaits the expected invitation to the next glass of chilled chardonnay and canapés, forgetting that due to their lack of leadership and drive, Wales remains firmly rooted to the bottom of the UK prosperity league ...

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CREATIVE CLASSES

One of my favourite academic books of the last two decades must be the “Rise of the Creative Classes” by Professor Richard Florida.  This was one of the first detailed studies of the growing group of individuals who use their creativity and mental labour to earn a living and not only included those in arts and entertainment, but also people working in science and technology as well as knowledge-based professions such as healthcare, law, business, and finance.  Fast forward to 2022 and Professor Florida has written an updated report on the creative classes although he and his team now identify a different type of individual who is taking full advantage of the growth in digital platforms, social media, and online marketplaces.  Such ‘creators’ are defined as those who use digital technology to make and publish unique creative content, whether in the form of video, film, art, music, design, text, games, or any other media that audiences can access and respond to.  They ...

GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP MONITOR WALES 2022

How entrepreneurial is Wales? That is the question that the latest Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) attempts to answer in its latest report which investigates those involved in early-stage entrepreneurship i.e. starting and managing a new business.  This year’s results show that the rate of total early-stage entrepreneurship (TEA) in Wales in 2021 was 10.3% as compared to 11.5% for the UK. This is significantly higher than the previous year (6.5%) and means that around 192,000 adults aged between 18 and 64 are involved in entrepreneurial activity in Wales.  Nearly three quarters are in the very early stages of starting a business and the rest involved in managing a new business aged between 4 and 42 months old.  This is an important finding as not only is the overall rate of entrepreneurial activity in Wales increasing but this is largely accounted for by those starting a business. In this respect, it is critical that the right support mechanisms are in place to ensu...