Last week, the Chilcot inquiry began into Britain’s role in the Second Iraq War which began in 2003. Like many in the UK during the months leading up to the decision to go to war, I was not convinced by the flimsy arguments put forward by the British Government as a pretext to committing our troops to war in Iraq. Indeed, I remember having quite heated debates with friends and colleagues who thought that Saddam Hussein should be removed whatever the cost. Unfortunately, too many of our MPs were also ready to follow this line at the time, ignore the evidence before their eyes and support Tony Blair’s suggestion that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction ready for deployment within forty five minutes. Why did Tony Blair cling to this line of argument for going to war with Iraq? Well, it would seem that his own Solicitor General, the UK’s top law officer, had informed him that there were only two legitimate and legal reasons for going to war , namely "humanitarian intervention" a...
Entrepreneurship, innovation and the economy