Skip to main content

Ethics

I recently conducted the latest in a series of interviews with successful Welsh entrepreneurs to try and discover what makes them, and their businesses, tick.

Thirty detailed interviews have been carried out to date (some are on video here), and the information gathered will, undoubtedly, lead to the production of some key academic papers in the field.

One of the key questions we ask during face to face conversations with the entrepreneurs is whether the values of the business reflect their own personal values. The aim of this is to probe the extent to which business ethics play a key role in the strategic development of the business.

The responses to date have been encouraging, despite the fact that many may think that ‘business ethics’ is an oxymoron, particularly in more entrepreneurial ventures. This variance to the accepted norm in our research findings reflects the high ethical values espoused by many growing firms in Wales.

Business schools have as much to learn from the personal behaviour of many Welsh entrepreneurs as they do from large conglomerates.

During the interviews, the term ‘honesty’ was used more than any other, along with the expressed belief that having an open style of management with employees, customers and suppliers could only be of benefit to the business.

For example, one business owner emphasised the importance of his relationship with his subcontractors where a policy of paying on time meant that, when one-off pieces of work needed to be done, the suppliers were more than happy to go the extra mile to help.

Another stated that, when attacked by their largest competitor, the approach undertaken by the business had shown the bigger company to be engaged in ‘corporate bullying’ and customers had moved across to the smaller firm because of their disdain for such practices.

It is therefore heartening that they are not only distinguishing between what is morally right and wrong in business practice but are actually setting standards which every organisation in Wales should follow.

Perhaps the difference with small firms is that the entrepreneur can set the moral direction for a company that all of its employees and stakeholders must acknowledge, if not follow. In many larger organisations, individuals in senior positions can often get away with ethical behaviour that benefit them personally but does little for the business in which they work.

I recently had personal experience of a situation where a 'respected' senior manager had consistently ignored standards of ethical behaviour in such a way that would have shocked many colleagues.

Yet this individual’s employer, a large organisation normally of the highest ethical standards, had done little to condemn this behaviour, even after discovering what had gone wrong.

Perhaps the argument for ignoring such a drop in ethical standards is that drawing a line under such behaviour will not raise any further embarrassment. However, it may then be accepted as the norm by other employees.

As a leading psychologist told me recently, ‘broken window’ syndrome, where one person gets away with such actions with no consequence to this behaviour leads to others within the organisation believing that they can also ‘get away with murder’.

Indeed, it is surprising how many senior managers and entrepreneurs forget that it can take years for an organisation to build a reputation although, through the actions of one or two of its employees, it will take only moments to lose it.

Whilst some, in an era of increased spin and deceit, may cynically frown on the development of moral codes of behaviour in business, our research shows that many of the growth businesses are succeeding not only because of the innovation or creativity of the founders, but as a result of the trust they have built up with stakeholders through their firm’s ethical behaviour.

Milton Friedman once said that the one and only social responsibility of business was to maximise profits for its shareholders. It is not often that I disagree with the great man but in this case I believe that the private sector can set standards which the public sector and even, or especially, politicians should follow.

Small firms in Wales are showing that things can be done differently and that profit can go hand in hand with honest ethical behaviour which takes into account the needs of all stakeholders in the business.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Are you referring to a former colleague of yours here who has recently moved jobs. If so, I can sympathise with your opinion as he has treated all his staff with utter contempt.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its