Skip to main content

Grants, the Bank and Mrs Merton

Two months ago, the Welsh Assembly Government heralded a ‘new era for business support’ with the aim of making Government backing for new or growing enterprises “faster, simpler and more responsive to their individual needs.”

Of course, the real question is whether the small firm sector will get the support it requires or whether the Assembly Government will continue to focus its efforts, as it has done during the last nine years, on offering large financial incentives in the form of regional selective assistance grants, for large companies to locate to Wales.

Some would argue that the latter situation will prevail and only this week, the Assembly Government provided major support to HSBC in creating 250 call centre jobs in Newport over the next couple of years.

I am big fan of HSBC and no one can blame them for taking advantage of such generosity when such a massive grant is waved in front of them by the Welsh Assembly Government? I am sure that any company of whatever size in the same situation would do the same.

However, for politicians to pretend that the only reason they located the jobs in Wales was because of other factors does tend to stretch credibility, particularly given the nature of the jobs within the call centre industry.

To an extent, it’s like the classic line from Mrs Merton, “So (Debbie McGee), what attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels”, except that in this case, it’s “So, HSBC, what attracted you to the grant-supported Welsh economy?”

No doubt, Assembly spokespersons will bring out the usual explanations regarding the high skill levels of the local workforce and the commitment of local supplier chains.

Yet despite these factors which do differentiate the Welsh economy from the other regions of the UK, policymakers still feel compelled to use taxpayers’ money to support highly profitable large companies that surely are able to pay their own way in relocating here in Wales.

So what is the extent of such largesse by our political masters? Believe it or not, actually discovering the value of grant awards to large companies has become nigh on impossible and even our elected representatives are unaware of the exact detail regarding grant assistance.

Indeed, the last time a specific paper on grant spend in Wales was presented to an Assembly Committee was over two years ago on May 3rd 2006. As a result, there is no accountability for the spending and it is frankly an incredible situation that the Welsh Government of the day no longer feels compelled to report on how it uses taxpayers money to support businesses across the nation.

The only source of information (for now), is to be found on the decision reports webpage of the Assembly Government, which regularly provides information on the decisions made by the Welsh Industrial Development Advisory Board (WIDAB). This is a statutory body which advises the Economic Development and Transport Minister on offers of Regional Selective Assistance(RSA) to business projects, usually over £500,000 in value.

An examination of the WIDAB grant approvals during the twelve months shows that £33.5 million of regional selective assistance grants was awarded to 21 companies across Wales at an average cost of £12,731 per job. Given the average size of the projects - £1.6 million – one can assume that these went to large firms either relocating here in Wales or expanding their operations. Of course, unlike a loan system, none of this grant money will be repaid by the large companies and so the Welsh taxpayer is essentially subsidising the operations of large companies which frankly do not need it.

It has been indicated that the new Single Investment Fund will be underpinned by a long term strategy of moving businesses away from grant support to an investment culture with the introduction of more repayable loans and grants with upside equity stakes. This would be a bold move but should also take into account the need to provide grant funding to the riskier end of business support, namely start-ups and R&D-based technology businesses, including those relocating here to Wales.

Any movement by the Assembly Government towards repayable grants must apply equally to large firms as to small firms. There cannot be a system where large firms are given non-repayable grants from the public purse whilst the Assembly Government penalises smaller firms unfairly or, worse still, starts to act as a public sector venture capitalist by putting together unworkable equity deals with more subclauses than a deal with the devil.

At a time when all firms are struggling with the credit crunch, we need a transparent business support structure that can make a difference to the Welsh economy. In this respect, the Assembly must ensure that it is not only large firms that get favourable treatment for the support required but that our small firm sector, which employs the majority of the Welsh workforce, also receives the same level of quality support as multinational corporations with their own deep pockets.

Comments

Anonymous said…
plus se chsnge plus se le meme chose
Anonymous said…
It looks like the Welsh economy is getting desperate? Whatever happened to a small clever country when we are spending millions of taxpayers money to subsidise jobs that they do better in India. Why do you bother, prof, as the lunatics in the asylum are incapable of listening. Ieuan should get you in now, despite the fact you're a tory.
Anonymous said…
Dylan is right HSBC like any other business took what's offered, the questions that need to be asked are how many local business could create jobs with the same money and is it what business wants. I notice that this story has eclipsed the poor coverage been given to the 40 million return from European Funds.

It the mindset that has to change, all economies offer companies incentives, but the Welsh Office/Welsh Assembly Government seems to have been paying companies not only to come but to stay in Wales for the last 20 years, proving that the economic policies of the Welsh Office and WAG have failed and continue to fail, hardly news but since when does anyone in WAG or the Civil Service listen to good advice.
Anonymous said…
So what's new ? Bannana Republic mentality, always was,always will be.
Anonymous said…
Twelve thousand pounds per job is far to much, I don't there is enough leverage of public money in a deal like that. We have politicians and civil servants negotiating large private companies,the former thinking they are clever, the latter not relying on cleverness but on commercial nous - no contest!
This of course reflects the woeful lack of scrutiny of the Assembly Government since May 2007 - Dylan has highlighted this issue, but there are others e.g. no questions asked about the Heads of the Valleys programme for over a year.

Come on opposition AMs, wake up - there is no shortage of issues.
Anonymous said…
lack pf scrutiny may account for the fact that BT was responsible for 25% of the gifts and hospitality that Assembly Members received in the first Assembly Term 1999 to 2003, and we still have crap telecoms and broadband infrastructure in Wales
Anonymous said…
lack pf scrutiny may account for the fact that BT was responsible for 25% of the gifts and hospitality that Assembly Members received in the first Assembly Term 1999 to 2003, and we still have crap telecoms and broadband infrastructure in Wales

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CREATIVE CLASSES

One of my favourite academic books of the last two decades must be the “Rise of the Creative Classes” by Professor Richard Florida.  This was one of the first detailed studies of the growing group of individuals who use their creativity and mental labour to earn a living and not only included those in arts and entertainment, but also people working in science and technology as well as knowledge-based professions such as healthcare, law, business, and finance.  Fast forward to 2022 and Professor Florida has written an updated report on the creative classes although he and his team now identify a different type of individual who is taking full advantage of the growth in digital platforms, social media, and online marketplaces.  Such ‘creators’ are defined as those who use digital technology to make and publish unique creative content, whether in the form of video, film, art, music, design, text, games, or any other media that audiences can access and respond to.  They also make their mon