Skip to main content

Public Private Partnerships

Everyone welcomes last week’s decision by the American company McKesson to create over three hundred new jobs in Bangor.

The company, which provides an integrated human resources and payroll system for the NHS, is a testament to the way that the private sector can provide efficient services within the public sector.

The sad irony, though, is that whilst this business was rightly supported by grant aid from the Assembly Government, the same Labour-Plaid coalition has itself ruled out any involvement by the private sector in the NHS in Wales.

Such an ideological approach to the delivery of public services could, over the long term, have a serious effect on ability to provide efficient services not only within our health service but across a range of other areas. Certainly, there is growing evidence that the private sector can make a real contribution to ensuring that the Welsh budget goes a little bit further.

According to the CBI and other business representative groups, there is enormous potential for Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in improving services by delivering efficiency savings.

Indeed, there is evidence that they can provide value for money for taxpayers, increase government transparency and financial accountability and encourage long-term collaboration through genuine partnering. Most importantly, at a time when the funding from the Treasury to Wales is reducing, enormous savings could be made for investment in front-line services.

In addition, there could be the leveraging of significant private sector investment for new projects and the opportunity to access private sector technical, management, and financial resources and expertise. Public sector managers could then focus on delivering their key services, rather than managing projects which take them away from their core business.

On the other hand, the trade unions have argued that PPPs result in higher additional costs due to private sector borrowing and a lack of consultation with public sector employees over the implementation of the scheme. There is also evidence of unfair contracts which load the risk in favour of business partners and no guarantee of quality buildings or service provision.

Of course, this moratorium on private involvement in the NHS has not stopped other parts of the public sector from working with businesses. Earlier this year, the Welsh Local Government Association agreed that private companies would have greater involvement in delivering council services, which could result in projects such as new schools being built through money provided from private funding.

Therefore, there are certainly opportunities for Welsh businesses to work more closely with the public sector, although to restrict this within the NHS, the largest organisation in Wales, does not make any sense at all.

Companies such as McKesson have shown that private sector involvement in the NHS can work and result in well-paid and skilled jobs. Hopefully, by providing millions of pounds in grants to support such a business in North Wales, the Assembly Government may finally appreciate that the private sector can play a major role in improving services in the NHS and, more importantly, can create wealth and employment in our economy as a result of such involvement.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is a complex issue and I wouldn't want to enter into the economic or financial aspects. But there are factors that apply when entering a contractual relationship that may not be so clear cut when providing the service from public sector resources. Considerable thought is required to produce a specification, and this need for clarity requires a disciplined approach involving necessary consultation (in the real sense not the superficial sense) of stakeholders.
Risk costs. So the more that is passed to the contractor the more one will have to pay - a trade off will exist here to balance risk allocation and contract price.
As far as ruling out private sector involvement, here is another example of an a priori approach to policy making. It does not suggest a thoughtful approach to managing the affairs of a country.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu