Skip to main content

Supporting habitual entrepreneurs

During the last few weeks, I have been working alongside Dr Piers Thompson of the University of Glamorgan to examine the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and utilise the fantastic dataset we have to examine the specific phenomenon of those who start up more than one business, commonly known as habitual entrepreneurs.

As many are aware, there has been an enormous growth in policies which have focused on the increasing the level of entrepreneurial activity across the world. Interestingly, the vast majority of resources are aimed at creating a greater understanding of entrepreneurship and providing a greater proportion of the population with the skills required to undertake such activities.

In Wales, as in many other countries, this has manifested itself through the massive growth in enterprise education activities, particularly within universities, although the jury is still out whether initiatives such as the Enterprise College have had any real effect on entrepreneurial activity.

More recently, it has been argued that policymakers, instead of supporting entrepreneurship in general, should concentrate their efforts on those with repeated and multiple involvements in start-up activities, namely habitual entrepreneurs. These can be divided into those who prefer to close one business before starting another (serial entrepreneurs), and those who run a number of businesses concurrently (portfolio entrepreneurs).

Why should this be the case?

Clearly, the experience gained by habitual entrepreneurs in their first venture can benefit the economy as it can lead to higher levels of efficiency, employment and growth. This can be through a better ability to deal with the liabilities of newness, greater use of effectual reasoning, and a less negative view of failure.

For example, habitual entrepreneurs tend to run larger businesses than novice entrepreneurs, which reflect their ability to raise start-up capital from the proceeds of previous businesses or through leverage of existing company assets. They will also use their previous track record in business ownership and their entrepreneurial experience to persuade venture capitalists to invest in their business.

So it is not surprising that some have called for policies and resources to be targeted at supporting these proven entrepreneurs rather than at increasing start-up levels in general, especially given the ‘liability of newness’ that many new firms face in terms of competition, finance, reputation and establishing a new idea in the marketplace.

You will have to read the academic paper for the full results, but I am glad to say that our research supports the notion that the contribution of habitual entrepreneurs to the total supply of new businesses is substantial. For example, whilst less than one percent of the population was involved in starting a business as a habitual entrepreneur, this constituted around one in three start-ups in the UK. More importantly for those looking to create a more entrepreneurial economy, the evidence suggests that those with previous experience of starting a business are more than three times as likely to be intending to start a new business than those who are doing it for the first time.

In terms of the different types of habitual entrepreneurs, portfolio entrepreneurs are the rarest type of business start, although these individuals who start multiple businesses have also the greatest probability of creating employment and high turnover businesses. They are also more likely to expect to introduce new products and open up new markets and to demand the highest amount of start-up capital to develop their new venture.

Therefore, the GEM research suggests that for the Welsh economy to truly benefit from entrepreneurship to its maximum potential, then creating a greater number of portfolio entrepreneurs should be a priority.

Currently, there is very little focus by policymakers on encouraging such entrepreneurial activity from existing successful businesspeople who not only have the ideas, but also have the expertise and experience to grow and develop a new business successfully. Whilst clearly we need to encourage more people to enter self-employment for the first time, there must also be an increasing focus on making the most of the talents of those who are already running existing businesses to create wealth and prosperity.

Comments

Neil Cocker said…
As a "portfolio entrepreneur" (now I know what to put on my new business cards!) this is music to my ears. I wouldn't want to take money away from those starting up for the first time - that financial support must surely be a huge boost to those getting on the entrepreneurial ladder for the first time. But it definitely makes sense to favour those who've committed to a life of entrepreneurship and, as the research suggests, are statistically more likely to create employment and high turnover businesses.

Interesting stuff. Thanks Dylan!
Neil - ta for your comments. I am glad you finally know what you are - makes the research worthwhile :)

It would be good if organisations supplying support, such as Finance Wales, would be more proactive in encouraging existing entrepreneurs to develop new commercial ideas and providing the necessary support. Could make a difference - something has to!
Neil Cocker said…
The problem I've found (on countless occasions) is that the organisations themselves are constricted by red tape to the extent that it's easier for them to fob you off than to help you. Unless you're lucky enough for your contact at the organisation to be very enthusiastic (Claire Heat at CBW and Richard Turner need to be praised for this) then you're likely to find yourself back at square one.
Welshwalker said…
Spot on Dylan.
'Portfolio entrepreneurs' should be encouraged. Serial entrepreneurs are probably those that have serial failures due to faults in their character or way of doing business.
However, successful portfolio entrepreneurs may be the least likely to want to engage with WAG Finance Wales or other red tape organisations having been burned in the past. So there is work to be done there.
In rural Wales, you need at least three income streams in order to stay afloat economically so that fits with having a portfolio of small enterprises.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

THE PERFECT STORM FACING THE UK ECONOMY

In his sublime 1997 book on the fate of the fishing boat Andrea Gale, the author Sebastian Junger defined a “perfect storm” as a rare combination of events or circumstances that results in an unusually bad situation.  This term would not be out of place in describing what is currently happening to the UK economy which is being battered on so many fronts with little respite in sight. For example, the war in Ukraine has had an unexpected impact on energy bills in Europe due to the curtailing of exports from Russia which, last year, was responsible for supplying 40% of all natural gas to the European Union. Whilst the UK is not dependent on Russia for its energy needs, the scramble by other countries to find alternative sources has resulted in higher prices globally which has impacted on the fuel imported by the UK with normal suppliers struggling to meet demand. There have also been considerable supply constraints globally which have been driven by manufacturers struggling to get their g