Excellent article by Professor Tony Chapman, Vice Chancellor of UWIC, in the House magazine.
His argument, reflected by all the universities in Wales I am sure, is that the government can’t keep asking Welsh universities to do more with less. Simply put,
His argument, reflected by all the universities in Wales I am sure, is that the government can’t keep asking Welsh universities to do more with less. Simply put,
- the deficit in public funding of universities in Wales, compared to England, amounts to £70m a year
- the size of the gap has grown to such an extent that it now represents 20 per cent of the total higher education budget in Wales, and equates to a shortfall of £1,000 in funding per student
- the gap between Wales and Scotland is even greater: £150m per annum, or £2,000 less per student.
- Making a persuasive case for universities getting a larger slice of the Assembly Government’s overall budget, especially as for every £1 invested by the Assembly Government, the economy receives an output of £5.30.
- Maintaining the absolute level of public funding in universities while reducing the volume of students in Wales, thereby engineering an improved level of funding per student, although the need for a workforce with a higher level of skills may pose a problem
- Altering the level of public subsidy given to Welsh-domiciled students and introducing top up fees for students
Comments
this being a stated commitment of the lib-dems, plaid and labour how can that circle be squared without humble pie or 'acquiring' from another pot - which is probably also a manifesto commitment?
Through leaving out the Conservatives, whether intentially or not, you put your finger right on the issue. We are likely to have a left-leaning (further left than Labour in England) hegemony in Wales for the foreseeable future; the voting system will never favour the Conservatives. The political culture will remain a dependant one, and a spending one. Freebies such as low tuition fees and prescription (these are iconic but they are significant), including for those who can afford to pay, will remain the political currency of this unreal politics.