Skip to main content

Barack Obama and the Welsh economy

After an enthralling few months in the political life of the United States of America, to say that the 5th of November 2008 was an historic day would be a gross understatement as Barack Obama became the first African-American leader of the world’s largest economy.

His election will surely bring political and economic stability after months of a lame duck president who had neither the leadership, nor the imagination, nor the energy to deal effectively with the financial crisis facing his country.

Most importantly, as I said on this blog last week, President-elect Obama’s victory may boost that most elusive of economic concepts, namely consumer confidence, among American citizens at a time when there has been enormous uncertainty within homes and businesses about the future.

It will be fascinating to see how the rest of the world reacts to the Obama win. Certainly, on Wednesday morning, it looked like the markets in the Far East had reacted positively, although share prices fell slightly in other markets later that day.

However, amid this general euphoria, there is potentially a small cloud on the horizon for the UK economy. In his economic manifesto, not only did President-elect Obama suggest that there should be tax penalties on US companies that relocate jobs overseas, but he also promised tax breaks for companies that create jobs in America.

In addition, he called for an end to tax laws that allow multinational corporations to defer paying taxes on the profit they make in foreign countries as long as they keep the money abroad. Instead, he proposed that the taxes created by any changes should be used to reward companies that create jobs in the United States by maintaining their headquarters in the United States.

Given his critical victories in blue-collar states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan, there will be enormous expectations that he keeps to these election promises.

This could have a significant impact on the Welsh economy, especially as the USA represents the largest proportion of inward investing companies in Wales. For example, the recent £70 million investment by Ford showed the importance of American manufacturers to our economy and any move towards protectionism could have serious implications over the next four years.

Indeed, there are already concerns that Airbus in North Wales could miss out on a £4 billion military contract which US politicians believe should go to Boeing. With the decision on the contract being left to the new administration which takes office in January, this could be a bellwether as to the future business intentions of Obama’s presidency.

With such potential pressures on the new President to prioritise US jobs, it is vital the UK Government moves quickly and positively to strengthen the “special relationship” that includes strong bilateral trade links to benefit both countries.

It is also critical that the Welsh Assembly Government maintains its effort to keep American firms in Wales and, more importantly, supports the excellent International Business Wales team based in New York to get US companies to continue their investment into Wales.

Any such trade links should work both ways and the importance of Welsh firms proactively seeking opportunities in the United States cannot be overemphasised. The re-emergence of the Wales North America Business Chamber as a vibrant network and a source of expertise and information is therefore to be welcomed and their event on November 20th at the Hilton Hotel should be attended by every business which wants to look to create a long term relationship with the world’s largest economy.

The last Democratic president of the United States was elected on the slogan “It’s the economy, Stupid” and it can be argued that his party’s iconic successor was also swept into office on the back of the financial crisis which engulfed the incumbent administration.

Despite the election rhetoric, America will not miraculously recover overnight from its financial problems and the next few months will be a real test as to whether President Obama’s policies can, as he has promised, revitalise the United States and whether “the audacity of hope” becomes the slogan for the recovery of the global economy.

Comments

Anonymous said…
noticed that the politics show lifted your entire article without even referring once to you.
Glyn Davies said…
Dylan - Dr Christopher Wood has been making this point repeatedly on my blog for weeks, and also made it forcefully on our televisions when he popped up in the audience on Question Time from Washington last week. Just thought I'd mention it.
Anonymous said…
Of course the BBC wont use you - youre a tory!
Draig said…
Interesting that Barack Obama is planning on implementing more "Protectionist" economic policies.

With all the talk about the "Great Depression" MK 2, it's interesting to note that one of the historical reasons given for the onset of the last Depression is that Protectionist policies implemented by the US government of the time caused a collapse in global commerce.

History, it seems, is starting to repeat itself...
Glyn> thanks for the acknowledgement; yes it was me who warned about this issue both on Question Time in DC and for weeks on Glyn’s blog. I have a LOT more stuff to write about – but now in the context of post Nov 4-2008 – Americans by and large fall in behind their new President and likely more so given the gravity of the current financial crisis.

As to Airbus (and by default the N. Wales aircraft wing plant), if memory serves, the Pentagon (which is about 5 or 10 minutes drive from my Arlington apartment) originally awarded the contract to Boeing. One of the guys at my law firm worked on C3 contracts at the Pentagon.

Anyways/milliways, McCain objected to the deal that Boeing got and got the Pentagon to retender the contract because McCain (and probably others) thought the bidding process that led to the deal with Boeing was a bad deal for the taxpayer; then EADS in partnership with Northrop won the contract - EADS were going to use Airbus (and hence Broughton, N. Wales plant) to make the wings for the Pentagon order/midair refueling tankers.

Despite McCain looking for a better deal it now looks like Boeing is going to get a third bite at the apple and get the contract to the chagrin of Airbus. Like Obama/Pelosi/Reid would let Airbus get loads of American aircraft workers’ jobs. This will likely cost Wales a billion or two in future wing orders/jobs. Just the beginning of the Obama/Pelosi/Reid job swing, which I warned about on Question Time.

Specifically, that Obama, Pelosi and Reid have all signaled that US corporations will be faced with carrot/stick changes to the Federal Tax Code. Elizabeth Edwards (wife of John Edwards who ran with Kerry against Bush/Cheney in 2004) strongly disagreed with me claiming that the (Federal) tax code would not be rewritten.

Well, I guess Elizabeth Edwards is not familiar with how the legislature/Executive works. It is Congress that is empowered to write and pass legislature and so it will be Congress that will rewrite the Federal tax code to reflect the carrot/stick approach as outlined by Obama/Pelosi/Reid in the run up to November 4 election day.

To wit, US companies will get tax credits/breaks (call them what you like) if they keep and/or generate jobs in the USA, and they will lose tax breaks/credits if they export jobs.

Glyn, there’s a LOT more coming down the Congressional pipe that will likely impact on the European (hence UK, hence Welsh) economy/jobs scene – I will post it to your blog if that is OK with you.
I forgot to add that I yapped on about blue collar swing states on BBC's Question Time - that Obama/Pelosi/Reid will priortize jobs for the blue collar swing states and Europe (and by default Wales) had 'better watch out'.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its