Skip to main content

Late payment

As regular readers of this blog will know, I have emphasised the vital issue of cashflow to many small firms during the current credit crunch, and the importance of public sector bodies paying their bills as soon possible .

To be fair, many local authorities are doing their best to facilitate this and whilst one of the best councils at settling in bills in 2007-2008 was Conwy, Monmouthshire County Council were less than impressive in their response according to the data from the WLGA.

Certainly, there should be an immediate response to ensure that officials in Monmouthshire brings the council up to the Welsh average payment period as soon as possible as there is little excuse for this, especially when it is critical for all public bodies to do their best to help small firms.

However, this issue is not just limited to public bodies and the largest problem for small firms is getting paid from other businesses, particularly larger ones.

Late payment has been one of the key problems identified by those managing a small business for many years. To deal with this, the UK Government introduced the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Act which gave small firms the statutory right to charge interest on all outstanding debts.

As a result of this legislation, it was envisaged that this problem would be largely eliminated. However, many small firms have been reluctant to charge interest on outstanding debts owed by larger firms because of the impact this could have on their relationship with their bigger partner who may not renew a contract with a ‘troublesome’ supplier.

And the situation is getting worse.

Recent research by the Federation of Small Businesses has shown that some large businesses are taking up to 100 days to settle many outstanding invoices and, at any one time, it is estimated that there are over 17,000 firms at risk of closure, with small firms owed more than £11 billion.

Worse still, the incomes of around 3.4 million people are at risk of delay every month as small firms are put in a position of being unable to pay their own workers on time with a real knock on effect for the economy.

Indeed, it has been estimated that over half of small businesses say they are owed more money by customers than they owe to suppliers, with micro-businesses with a turnover of under £50,000 per annum suffering the most and having to fund the resulting cash shortfalls with overdrafts and credit cards.

To top it all, large firms are also demanding discounts from small firms if bills are paid on time.

Of course, this issue was not a problem at a time when banks were happy to let small firms have extended overdraft limits which enabled them to be flexible over payments from customers. However, with banks tightening their own lending criteria, the situation for small firms will undoubtedly get worse unless action is taken to solve this problem.

The question is whether the UK government should penalise large firms to attempt to rectify this problem as the current legislation is not working?

Certainly, with the economy slowing down, it would be expected that payment terms will become even more onerous to small firms as larger businesses, in order to protect their own profits, pass the cash problem onto their small suppliers. This will be most prevalent within the retail sector, which is expected to be hardest hit by any recession as consumer spending grinds to a halt.

So, driven by the immediacy of getting cash into businesses, perhaps the time has come for politicians, who regularly call small firms the backbone of the economy, to finally ensure that entrepreneurs are treated fairly by their larger customers.

As I said at the beginning of this article, it is also important for the public sector to continue its efforts to ensure that bills from small firms are settled quickly.

Yesterday, the Welsh Assembly Government stated at its second 'economic summit' that it would increase the proportion of payments made within 10 days, of which the first step will be to work to ensure that the 30 day target is met consistently by the Welsh public sector.

I hope that this promise has already been implemented by civil servants and that small firms are beginning to get the cash they need to survive this credit crunch (especially as I know of at least one business that is still waiting for a WAG bill to be paid over 50 days after sending in the invoice).

Comments

Anonymous said…
side steping the fact that it is Tory councils failing miserably here and chucking the blame back on WAG. Typical from this blog. Best get back to writting those glowing reports about yourself Dylan!
Anonymous said…
In fairness to DJE (myself speaking as a Plaid man), the Monmouthshire situation is down to the officers and not the politicians. If nothing has changed in 6 months, then put the boot in to the Tories there.
This is one of the few areas that WAG can deliver and they need to do so, as do the WLGA.
Anon 1 - Glad you enjoyed the supplement. Happy to autograph it if you want to :)

Anon 2 - There is a tendency by the odd commentator to paint everything on this blog as pro or anti-tory which stifles any real debate.

I wonder what Anon 1 doesn't agree with?

Is it low interest rates, support for tourism, better procurement, providing better loans to small firms or more local purchasing?

These have all been discussed on this blog during the last year and, ironically, are now official policy at a UK and Welsh level, albeit a bit late.

Even the economic summit is something that this blog called for ten months ago.

Personally, I believe the late payment situation is totally unacceptable in Monmouthshire if it is unduly affecting small firms If the policy has not been changed, then heads should roll.

The blog did not point the finger at WAG at all although some of my colleagues in the official opposition should start asking questions as to the situation regarding payments to firms and whether it is being accelerated or not. remember, I am not an AM, they are!

However, the focus of this article is not on the public sector but on the large firms who flaunt their position and who should not only be compelled to pay on time but should also be compelled to pay their rightful of corporation tax, which many don't.
Dylan,
The question of large firms paying late is a very difficult one. It is always the small companies (and often the good ones) who crash and burn at times like these, almost always down to showing good service to the larger firms they are servicing for and being left high and dry when the larger firms put them last on their list of priorities.
In Local Government, we work within strict procurement rules but always look to get tenders from reliable local firms, yet sometimes I dread coming back to work on Monday, wondering if they are still in business.
In my 18 years in Engineering, I can never remember the business being so unsure of its future.
Due2pay said…
UK limited companies may wish to take advantage of www.due2pay.co.uk. This is a member site which lists late payers. DUE2PAY started after a business I supplied closed down owing over £500,000 to many companies.
We have a couple of nice features such as a Wish List, we will send an email to a member whenever a company he puts on his wish list is listed as a late payer. Members must only list UNDISPUTED invoices, if one is listed by mistake then the late payer can flag this up. In order to protect members from issues such as slander, free text is not allowed. A fax and email is sent to a late payer advising him that if he does not pay within 14 days, then his company will be listed on www.due2pay.co.uk.

Information on the site is simple and factual, ‘money is owed to me, please pay me’.
There is a free 60 day trial period followed by monthly payments of £15.
This gives full use of the site and the ability to list and Watch List all your customers and those you are thinking of doing business with. Compare this with the cost of solicitors’ letters and other debt collection methods and it starts to make sense.
We do not take a commission or a percentage of your invoices.
DUE2PAY is a business which I wished was available when my business was forced to close.
Anonymous said…
I am still waiting for the various measure to reach me - one sme in the Valleys and counting

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu