Skip to main content

Get the money out to small firms




“Happy New Year!” was the refrain across the land as the clocks struck midnight on Wednesday night.

However, many economists would suggest that “happy” would be the last adjective they would use to describe 2009 and that it looks like being one of the worst years in living memory for the business sector.

Certainly, the reality of the situation is beginning to hit home with the man and woman in the street. A recent survey showed that less than 20% believe the Chancellor of Exchequer’s prediction that the recession would end this year.

The latest economic data makes grim reading for even the most optimistic observer. The British Chambers of Commerce believe that there will be a fall of nearly 3% in economic growth during the next year, worse even than the 1990s recession. It has also predicted unemployment hitting three million (or 10% of the workforce) over the next two years which, if translated to Wales, will mean around 150,000 out of work.

In terms of the housing sector, little seems to be happening despite the record cut in interest rates. Mortgage lending rates in November were at their worst for nine years and there are real fears that, contrary to government expectations, banks will lend less in 2009 to both consumers and businesses. Worse still, house prices are forecast to fall even further depreciating the only real asset that many people have at a time when the rates for savers have worryingly declined.

Insolvencies are set to rise to record levels and, following the demise of high street names such as Woolworths, MFI and Adams, it would seem that retail is set to bear the brunt of this recession, meaning that the pain will be felt in every town in the UK.

According to the market research company Experian, over 1,600 British retailers will go out of business in 2009 among the worst trading conditions in 30 years. This will result in thousands of job losses not only in the shops themselves but also in suppliers, manufacturing firms and service companies. Worst of all, it will leave 10% of shops empty, thus depressing consumer perceptions even further.

While the record falls for the pound against the euro and the dollar should be boosting exports, there seems to be little evidence yet of this potential benefit feeding through into the manufacturing sector.

The latest data from the CIPS survey of interest rates showed that December was the worst month for manufacturing since 1992. With firms shedding jobs at a record rate, it would seem that depressed global demand is not helping our factories. This is a significant worry for the Welsh economy as we are more dependent on the manufacturing sector than other regions in the UK.

So what can be done amongst all this gloom and doom? It all comes down, in the end, to common sense approaches.

I shall discuss the Welsh approach next week as I believe we have some unique opportunities which, if utilised properly could see us limiting the damage to the economy of Wales. However, at a wider UK level, the Government should stop tinkering with devices such as a 2.5% cut in VAT which has done nothing to boost retail confidence at a time when goods are being cut in price by 50% or more in almost all shops.

The real issue is to get the banks to adopt a sensible lending policy to our beleaguered business sector which does not involve cutting overdraft limits, withdrawing short term loans and increasing administrative fees for small firms.

If this involves government partly guaranteeing loans and overdrafts to small firms, then this needs to be the way forward to ensure that jobs are safeguarded and businesses survive.

If this is not done quickly, then my worry is that thousands of well managed businesses will go to the wall because of short-term cashflow problems brought about through no fault of their own, such as the collapse of a major customer and funding restrictions from banks.

The onus is now on ministers to act before it is too late and I remain convinced that if one of the banks in which the Government has a major stake – such as RBS – were to do this, then the other financial institutions would have very little option but to follow suit.

If we can get cash flowing to the business community once again, then the recession may be shallower than many of the economic forecasters have predicted.

Comments

Dylan,
Blwyddyn Newydd Dda i ti a'r teulu.
Cytuno 100%...dylai fod y Llywodraeth, sef prif gyfranddalwr RBS ddweud wrth peneithiaid y Banc i fabwysiadu strategaeth o'r fath ar unwaith.
Chris said…
Dylan

Your analysis is hard to fault but still doesn't move us on. The biggest determinant to anyone lending money is NOT what "reward will I get?" (important though that is) - it's "will I get my money back?"

And yet....banks who DON'T borrow to then lend on will die, because that's their raison d'etre.

So far so good, but then you (and others) are saying HMG must guarantee loans that banks are unhappy about. Which means we all pick up the tab for more of "carry on as before"(i.e. irresponsible lending) ....and you're a Tory! My goodness!

HMG should ONLY go into debt and give gurantees to kick-start projects that build the future (in one word - infrastructure). In US, it's citizens are still having a ride out to this day on all the public works that were deficit-funded in the 1930's. That's the way forward. Generate the construction and allied jobs, the workers spend the wages and pay the taxes, the banks get workable loan proposals from businesses who need to meet the demand created by their spending, and off we go. Huge, hopeful.... Go for it!
Chris - the issue is that banks are cutting their exposure to all businesses and not applying their usual risk to return formulae. Indeed, some are reducing their overdrafts by sector regardless of the financial state of the individual companies because corporate HQs of banks - who are far removed from any individual firm - are making decisions based on their own liquidity positions, despite being given billions by the taxpayer to support individuals and businesses. They clearly believe that all businesses are a risk at the moment and are not lending but this does not help those firms who need to improve their cashflow which is being restricted by economic circumstances and not because they are bad businesses in themselves. However, if that risk could be reduced to the banks then it is clear that this would support a number of firms and, more importantly, the vast majority of the ‘money’ would be returned to government at a later date (i.e. it would only be drawn down if the company went bust). It would also boost banks as they would be seen to be lending again, and this would feed through into the share price and boost confidence in the wider market place. It is certainly more effective than blowing £12 billion on VAT cuts that have been lost in the pre and post Christmas sales within the retail sector.
Chris said…
Thanks for your comments, Dylan - much appreciated. I do understand that the 'confidence' issue gives this matter much of its complexity,and that the logjam can now only be broken by Government.

I suppose that what I do find scary is that the same banks who have been seen to have been lending irresponsibly WITHOUT government guarantee are somehow expected to make the mental trip to a position of lending responsibly even when HMG is paying, if it goes wrong. You have to agree there's something counter-intuitive about someone being more careful with HMG's money than their own!

Referring to the other bit of the post, I'd also be intrigued to know what the 'correct' Tory take now is on going 'FDR' and running up a deficit to fund infrastructure spending on a massive scale. Are y'all ready for that, yet?

Meanwhile, thanks for a super blog, biting on the things that really matter.

PS You are so right about the daftness of the VAT sop - quite scary that well-meaning intelligent folk wanting to do the right thing can be so inept.
Anonymous said…
Prof - Peston is taking the same line as you

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/01/british_banks_have_to_lend_mor.html

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CREATIVE CLASSES

One of my favourite academic books of the last two decades must be the “Rise of the Creative Classes” by Professor Richard Florida.  This was one of the first detailed studies of the growing group of individuals who use their creativity and mental labour to earn a living and not only included those in arts and entertainment, but also people working in science and technology as well as knowledge-based professions such as healthcare, law, business, and finance.  Fast forward to 2022 and Professor Florida has written an updated report on the creative classes although he and his team now identify a different type of individual who is taking full advantage of the growth in digital platforms, social media, and online marketplaces.  Such ‘creators’ are defined as those who use digital technology to make and publish unique creative content, whether in the form of video, film, art, music, design, text, games, or any other media that audiences can access and respond to.  They also make their mon