Skip to main content

Get the money out to small firms




“Happy New Year!” was the refrain across the land as the clocks struck midnight on Wednesday night.

However, many economists would suggest that “happy” would be the last adjective they would use to describe 2009 and that it looks like being one of the worst years in living memory for the business sector.

Certainly, the reality of the situation is beginning to hit home with the man and woman in the street. A recent survey showed that less than 20% believe the Chancellor of Exchequer’s prediction that the recession would end this year.

The latest economic data makes grim reading for even the most optimistic observer. The British Chambers of Commerce believe that there will be a fall of nearly 3% in economic growth during the next year, worse even than the 1990s recession. It has also predicted unemployment hitting three million (or 10% of the workforce) over the next two years which, if translated to Wales, will mean around 150,000 out of work.

In terms of the housing sector, little seems to be happening despite the record cut in interest rates. Mortgage lending rates in November were at their worst for nine years and there are real fears that, contrary to government expectations, banks will lend less in 2009 to both consumers and businesses. Worse still, house prices are forecast to fall even further depreciating the only real asset that many people have at a time when the rates for savers have worryingly declined.

Insolvencies are set to rise to record levels and, following the demise of high street names such as Woolworths, MFI and Adams, it would seem that retail is set to bear the brunt of this recession, meaning that the pain will be felt in every town in the UK.

According to the market research company Experian, over 1,600 British retailers will go out of business in 2009 among the worst trading conditions in 30 years. This will result in thousands of job losses not only in the shops themselves but also in suppliers, manufacturing firms and service companies. Worst of all, it will leave 10% of shops empty, thus depressing consumer perceptions even further.

While the record falls for the pound against the euro and the dollar should be boosting exports, there seems to be little evidence yet of this potential benefit feeding through into the manufacturing sector.

The latest data from the CIPS survey of interest rates showed that December was the worst month for manufacturing since 1992. With firms shedding jobs at a record rate, it would seem that depressed global demand is not helping our factories. This is a significant worry for the Welsh economy as we are more dependent on the manufacturing sector than other regions in the UK.

So what can be done amongst all this gloom and doom? It all comes down, in the end, to common sense approaches.

I shall discuss the Welsh approach next week as I believe we have some unique opportunities which, if utilised properly could see us limiting the damage to the economy of Wales. However, at a wider UK level, the Government should stop tinkering with devices such as a 2.5% cut in VAT which has done nothing to boost retail confidence at a time when goods are being cut in price by 50% or more in almost all shops.

The real issue is to get the banks to adopt a sensible lending policy to our beleaguered business sector which does not involve cutting overdraft limits, withdrawing short term loans and increasing administrative fees for small firms.

If this involves government partly guaranteeing loans and overdrafts to small firms, then this needs to be the way forward to ensure that jobs are safeguarded and businesses survive.

If this is not done quickly, then my worry is that thousands of well managed businesses will go to the wall because of short-term cashflow problems brought about through no fault of their own, such as the collapse of a major customer and funding restrictions from banks.

The onus is now on ministers to act before it is too late and I remain convinced that if one of the banks in which the Government has a major stake – such as RBS – were to do this, then the other financial institutions would have very little option but to follow suit.

If we can get cash flowing to the business community once again, then the recession may be shallower than many of the economic forecasters have predicted.

Comments

Dylan,
Blwyddyn Newydd Dda i ti a'r teulu.
Cytuno 100%...dylai fod y Llywodraeth, sef prif gyfranddalwr RBS ddweud wrth peneithiaid y Banc i fabwysiadu strategaeth o'r fath ar unwaith.
Chris said…
Dylan

Your analysis is hard to fault but still doesn't move us on. The biggest determinant to anyone lending money is NOT what "reward will I get?" (important though that is) - it's "will I get my money back?"

And yet....banks who DON'T borrow to then lend on will die, because that's their raison d'etre.

So far so good, but then you (and others) are saying HMG must guarantee loans that banks are unhappy about. Which means we all pick up the tab for more of "carry on as before"(i.e. irresponsible lending) ....and you're a Tory! My goodness!

HMG should ONLY go into debt and give gurantees to kick-start projects that build the future (in one word - infrastructure). In US, it's citizens are still having a ride out to this day on all the public works that were deficit-funded in the 1930's. That's the way forward. Generate the construction and allied jobs, the workers spend the wages and pay the taxes, the banks get workable loan proposals from businesses who need to meet the demand created by their spending, and off we go. Huge, hopeful.... Go for it!
Chris - the issue is that banks are cutting their exposure to all businesses and not applying their usual risk to return formulae. Indeed, some are reducing their overdrafts by sector regardless of the financial state of the individual companies because corporate HQs of banks - who are far removed from any individual firm - are making decisions based on their own liquidity positions, despite being given billions by the taxpayer to support individuals and businesses. They clearly believe that all businesses are a risk at the moment and are not lending but this does not help those firms who need to improve their cashflow which is being restricted by economic circumstances and not because they are bad businesses in themselves. However, if that risk could be reduced to the banks then it is clear that this would support a number of firms and, more importantly, the vast majority of the ‘money’ would be returned to government at a later date (i.e. it would only be drawn down if the company went bust). It would also boost banks as they would be seen to be lending again, and this would feed through into the share price and boost confidence in the wider market place. It is certainly more effective than blowing £12 billion on VAT cuts that have been lost in the pre and post Christmas sales within the retail sector.
Chris said…
Thanks for your comments, Dylan - much appreciated. I do understand that the 'confidence' issue gives this matter much of its complexity,and that the logjam can now only be broken by Government.

I suppose that what I do find scary is that the same banks who have been seen to have been lending irresponsibly WITHOUT government guarantee are somehow expected to make the mental trip to a position of lending responsibly even when HMG is paying, if it goes wrong. You have to agree there's something counter-intuitive about someone being more careful with HMG's money than their own!

Referring to the other bit of the post, I'd also be intrigued to know what the 'correct' Tory take now is on going 'FDR' and running up a deficit to fund infrastructure spending on a massive scale. Are y'all ready for that, yet?

Meanwhile, thanks for a super blog, biting on the things that really matter.

PS You are so right about the daftness of the VAT sop - quite scary that well-meaning intelligent folk wanting to do the right thing can be so inept.
Anonymous said…
Prof - Peston is taking the same line as you

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/01/british_banks_have_to_lend_mor.html

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu