Skip to main content

Wales and European Funds


As many of you are aware, Wales was given an unexpected boost at the end of 2006 by qualifying for a second round of European funding.

Whilst being one of the poorest regions in the whole of Europe is nothing to be proud of, the £2 billion in funds from Brussels could help develop the competitiveness of the Welsh economy at a time when it is needed the most. Of course, this money came after £1.2 billion had already been given to Wales under the old Objective 1 programme for the period 2000-2006.

Ensuring that the money is spent on projects that make a real difference to the Welsh economy is critical, especially at a time when other public sector budgets to support business are being stretched to the limit.

Many would therefore have been shocked and dismayed at the revelations from last week’s National Assembly’s European and External Affairs committee, where it was allegedly revealed that £77 million of European funds will have to be returned to Brussels because it has been unspent during the Objective 1 programme.

If this is the case, then it is a real tragedy for Wales as that funding could have made a real difference in a number of businesses and communities in our poorest areas.

Of course this must not be allowed to happen again, although this comes after concerns that the current European programme is becoming over-bureaucratic and that key projects are being delayed even though they have been in development for over fifteen months.

For example, I have been told that there are a number of significant research and development projects from the region that, despite having been in development since September 2007, have yet to be approved. This is clearly unacceptable especially as the university sector has a key role to play in boosting the Welsh economy and it is vitally important that those projects are given the green light as soon as possible.

Similarly, projects being developed by local authorities are also awaiting approval and, given the current financial crisis hitting many councils, there may be difficulty in actually finding the necessary match funding which is needed because of other budgetary pressures.

Whilst the Assembly Government, argues that it has allocated over £520 million, mainly to projects it manages itself, very little of this has actually been spent to date because of the delays in starting projects that can make a real difference and, with recession looming, private firms may not be able to now find the funding necessary to participate in programmes.

We all appreciate that there is a need for detailed scrutiny of any publicly funded project. However, it is becoming clear there has been an inordinate amount of time since applications were submitted and whilst the assessment process needs to be thorough, it should not take more than a couple of months to assess any business plan.

It could be argued that the slow pace of spending isn’t an issue and that Wales will catch up with its expenditure. However, it has been suggested that, under European financial rules, money may have to be returned again if the programmes have not spent £130 million by the end of this year.

If Wales is going to come out of recession in a strong position, it must use every opportunity available.

Having access to additional European structural funds like the Convergence programme is an advantage most other parts of the UK do not have and we must get the funding out as quickly as possible. If this requires more resources to assess the viability of the projects caught in the logjam, then politicians have to ensure that these are made available.

Europe has presented Wales with a second opportunity to make a real difference to the economy.

Let’s not throw it away because of an unnecessary obsession with bureaucracy.

Comments

Anonymous said…
less bureaucracy ========== watching the pigs going by over head.
I think we need to sort WEFO out there is a major case here of the tail wag'in the dog.
Mmm I seem to be into old saying today, bit like our government really
Anonymous said…
Many people agree that we have to make the most of the opportunity we have from Convergance Funds.

A word of advice, try getting your own party in Cardiff Bay to take some interest in this matter Dylan and do what an opposition is meant to do, hold Labour and Plaid to account over the multiple failings of the current EU programme, otherwise Wales is going to be in line for a third lot of money because we would have fallen so far behind.
Anonymous said…
There have been failings here but you cannot ignore the fact that there was an additional amount of funding due to the Euro's strength, the private sector are skint and in decline and the WAG budget is very tight without the ability to match the funding at relatively short notice.
Having said that, we need to sort out the attitude of elements of the Civil Service in Wales. It needs to be devolved and for public sector workers to move freely between Councils, WAG and the NHS. They need to share their combined expertise, based on Wales's priorities and not on the London model of Government.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu