Skip to main content

University Tuition Fees




The last month saw a highly divisive split within Plaid Cymru over the issue of top up fees within our universities.

So what was all the fuss about?

Simply put, Welsh students who study in Wales currently pay £1,285 a year towards the costs of their tuition, rather than the full fee of up to £3,225 they would otherwise pay.

In contrast, students in England are charged the full top up fees and it was a combination of Plaid, Lib Dem and Conservative Assembly Members who ensured that Welsh students were subsidised to attend university.

The same parties fought the 2007 Assembly election promising that they would not make students pay the extra top up fees. However, now Plaid is in Government with Labour, it has now decided to scrap the fee subsidy and focus some of the funds saved on those from the poorest families.

Why would Plaid and Labour want to do that?

The answer is simple – money.

There is currently a £61 million funding gap between English and Welsh universities and politicians have refused to make good this deficit from their current budget. Instead, they have now decided take tens of millions away from students and to give it directly to universities to help close this gap.

Certainly, our universities need the funding and the settlement announced yesterday from the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales was considerbaly less than for England and so widened the gap even further.

Only earlier this week, Bangor University admitted that it was £5 million short of reaching their financial target for next year. Quite rightly, the institution has begun a range of actions to deal with this deficit including a review of academic and operational activities to reduce costs and remove duplication, developing a new procurement strategy and looking for greater efficiencies through improved resource and energy management. As the university admits, there will be cutbacks across the university, with reductions in expenditure, discussion of introduction of early retirement and voluntary severance schemes as well as an introduction of a temporary freeze on staff recruitment.

If Bangor’s financial situation is indicative of the higher education sector as a whole, then there must be serious doubts as to whether universities will be in a position, as they have pledged, to make any significant contribution in supporting the Welsh economy in dealing with the coming recession.

It is easy to forget that they are vital partners in ensuring that the £2 billion of European Convergence funding is used to improve the competitiveness of the Welsh economy. If they are struggling to find money to run their day-to-day operations, there must serious worries that they can find the additional matched funding that is necessary for projects to be given the green light.

Indeed, the Welsh European Funding Office which administers and manages European funds may well refuse applications from institutions in difficulties because of the risk that they may not be able to deliver the projects because of other financial pressures.

This would be a tragedy for the Welsh economy as it will be those economies that are innovative, competitive and drawing on higher value-added skills which will emerge from the recession in a strong position. If we starve our universities of vital funds to develop skills and innovation, then we will continue to be the poorest part of the UK for years to come.

As is likely to be announced today, is taking money out of the pockets of students at a time when the majority of families across Wales are facing increased financial hardship the way forward?

Indeed, before making such a decision, politicians would be wise to heed the words of an ex-President of Harvard University, who said that: "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance".

Certainly, those in power have hardly blinked before giving billions of taxpayers’ money to support the banking system.

If they can do that, then they should have no hesitation in providing the right level of support for an education system that will sustain and develop our economy in the future.

Comments

Anonymous said…
looks messy in bangor and not a very happy house - years of "RAE" is the be-all and end-all and now they're in the brown stuff, with aber showing far greater and more realistic vision and swansea just jumping forward. Why and how did they get it so wrong?

Anyone see Bangor's terrible bullying stats in the UCU survey?
Anonymous said…
The last few times I have been to bangor the people seem a lot ruder than they used to be. I think the whole area is getting more abusive. It is reward culture. Don't give bullies jobs.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu