Skip to main content

Another one bites the dust

IT was with great sadness that I read this week’s report that Bangor-based DeepStream Technologies, once chosen as a technology pioneer by the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, gave up its battle for survival and went into administration yesterday.

According to reports, this was not done by the company, but by one of its major creditors who seem to have decided that they would be better off getting back a small proportion of the money owed to them rather than supporting the development of the company.

Established in 2003, DeepStream Technologies had designed a range of smart sensors that would enable the next generation of energy efficiency devices to be developed for a range of uses both in the business and consumer markets.

They were essentially tapping into the zeitgeist of clean technologies and carbon off-setting, and were recognised as being at the forefront of their field for doing so.

For example, under the leadership of its chief executive Mark Crosier the company was ranked second in the Guardian’s CleanTech 100 – a listing of the 100 leading European cleantech companies – and was selected as one of just 23 companies on the UK Clean Tech Start-Up Company Index 2008.

It is exactly the type of high technology innovative company that is desperately needed in Wales and, as Rhodri Morgan himself said, had the potential to show that “companies can make it in Wales, and make it big”.

Clearly, there are some questions to be asked about how and why a company like this could go under, especially when there is, allegedly, vast amounts of Government finance available for supporting such innovative businesses through the recession.

Take, for example, the much lauded £15m Jeremie Fund that our politicians have been shouting about from the rooftops for the last few months.

As the Deputy First Minister himself wrote recently

“the Jeremie Fund will be of great value in helping Welsh businesses to ride out the recession… which delivers on the promise we made in the One Wales programme of Government to use ‘all the tools available to us’ to enable Welsh businesses to flourish and expand, including exploring options for seeking an agreement with the European Investment Bank. It will enable Finance Wales plc, a commercial funding provider owned by the Welsh Assembly Government, to make debt and equity investments to small and medium-sized businesses throughout Wales.”

Many will now be asking whether the failure of DeepStream Technologies, for whatever reasons, poses serious questions as to Jeremie’s fitness for purpose in supporting knowledge-based businesses in Wales to ride out the recession.

For example, if such financial support is available, then why wasn’t it used to save this company? Was DeepsStream Technologies encouraged to apply for such support by the Welsh Assembly Government? If so, were the owners turned down and what were the reasons for this? If WAG knew they were in trouble, what steps were taken to see by Finance Wales to support them? Did Finance Wales have any discussions whatsoever with DeepStream about their problems?

As anyone involved in the knowledge-based sector will tell you, great economic rewards only come after high technology firms have burnt through a lot of money in taking intellectual property to the marketplace.

There is a lot of risk associated with this but there is also the potential to create the next Google or Microsoft. Like similar technology-based businesses globally, Deepstream were struggling to raise such funds in the open market during this recession.

However, that is when government should step in – when the market has failed – and for some reason that just did not happen, despite Wales having the unique advantage of £150m being available from Europe.

Apart from the one-trick pony that is the Pro-Act scheme, if there was ever a sign that Wales is being seriously hit by this recession and WAG being unable (or unwilling) to do anything about it, then this is it.

If DeepStream Technologies can go under, a company recognised globally for its technologies and innovation, then what hope is there for the rest of Welsh business?

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is indeed a diabolical cockup if true. However before blaming the WAG it may be better to wait for further explanation for the reasons behind DeepStream Technologies failure. It may well be that the science and technology behind their business might be flawed or unworkable - there are many examples of so-called dynamic entrepreneurs gilding the lily as it were.
Which creditor pulled the plug - was it a bank?

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu