Skip to main content

MPs expenses - either apologise and repay the money or go

With further revelations in today's Daily Telegraph about the abuse of the expenses system by senior members of the Conservative Party, I believe that David Cameron has no option but to ask them to apologise and to pay back every single penny claimed for these extravagances.

If they do not, then he should instruct them that the party whip will be withdrawn immediately and they will not be standing for the party at the next general election.

Yes, all this was done within parliamentary rules and was approved by the House of Commons.

However, it clearly contravenes the spirit of the rationale for MPs expenses, namely to carry out their parliamentary duties.

They should now act like honourable men, admit that they had got it wrong and repay the money.

It is as simple as that.

This probably the defining moment in David Cameron's leadership of the Conservative Party and I believe, as someone who joined the party because of his promises for change, that he will act decisively over this matter and break with the past.

The one silver lining is that there will be a brand new set of MPs coming in at the next general election who will have been rightly appalled by the way that current members have abused the system and will ensure that this will never happen again.

Comments

Anonymous said…
But you know Dylan this has not been done within Parliamentary rules. Check out the green book and what it says, the excuse doesnt stand up
I know but you have to ask why the House of Commons approved these expenses?

My view is absolutely clear - this is now a matter of honour and maintaining whatever dignity is left within the House of Commons.

All MPs should therefore volunteer to repay all items claimed for which are outside of what they should be receiving in the course of doing their jobs for their constituents.

If not, then they should have the whip withdrawn and they should stand down at the next election.
Anonymous said…
Its not only MP,s who "Are at it",but our very own Assembly members to,The Plaid member for Conwy claimed a £1000.00 FOR CAMERAS,what has that to do with genuine Assembly expenses,not a lot i think



























3

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its