Skip to main content

A FUTURE FOR ANGLESEY?

Last week, Anglesey suffered a major blow when the plan to build a major retail, business and leisure park on the island, and create 1300 new jobs, was cancelled by developers when the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) decided to call the scheme in for a public enquiry.

This came after Anglesey Aluminium had decided to shut its Holyhead plant with the loss of 500 jobs, the earlier closure of large firms such as Eaton Electronics, and the rejection of the opportunity to build a sustainable job-creating marina at Beaumaris.

Whilst some local economies could cope with such disappointments, it must be remembered that Anglesey remains the poorest county in the whole of the UK, where the average prosperity is £10,560, roughly half the national average.

You would therefore have thought that in an economic situation where Anglesey is faring worse than any other part of the UK, WAG would have now stepped in with some serious long term financial support. Yet, apart from the £15 million provided for the so-called “Mon and Menai” plan, much of which will go to Bangor and its university, no real cash has been put together to support the island.

Whilst officials within both the North Wales branch of WAG and Anglesey Council are passionate about supporting the local economy, their efforts will ultimately be wasted if politicians won’t make the money available to make a real difference to the economy.

Of course, those in Government would argue that they are already making a difference but their only real tool for coping with the recession, namely the ProAct scheme, has had little impact on supporting industry on the island. In addition, the hundreds of small businesses on Anglesey are still wondering what happened to Plaid Cymru’s election pledge to cut business rates, a promise that somehow disappeared once the party entered into coalition with Labour.

Worst of all, whilst there is £2 billion of European funding available to support poor areas such as Anglesey, very little of it (with the exception of the new £5 million coastal project) has gone to help the local economy.

So what can be done about Anglesey’s economy?

As I mentioned earlier, the island is the poorest county in the whole of the UK and given such an exceptional situation, there needs to be an exceptional approach.

At the very least, the Assembly should break with its current policy of ignoring local demands and devote a significant amount of support directly for the island, guaranteeing at least £100 million from European Structural Funding over the next five years and matching that directly from its economic development budget.

This would ensure that officials could begin to plan the economic recovery of the island knowing they have money available and develop an offer to private businesses that could be unrivalled in the whole of Wales.

Of course, if the politicians wanted to be really visionary, they could press to ensure that Wylfa B is commissioned as soon as possible and ensure that a proper infrastructure is created around the new power station, such as a new science park focused on supporting the nuclear industry and the energy generating sector as a whole.

Indeed, there would be no reason why Anglesey couldn’t assume the tag of “the energy island”, especially given the massive potential of other types of climate friendly energy sources, such as wind, solar and tidal, all of which could also be prioritised for development to create several thousand sustainable well-paid jobs.

Wales is currently the poorest region in the UK and Anglesey the poorest county in Wales. If we are to address our long term economic problems across the nation, then there is no better to start than with Mon, Mam Cymru.

Comments

Paul Williams said…
Dylan, I wonder if you could help. At the NFU/FUW hustings in Llangefni last week Albert Owen denied that Anglesey was the poorest county in the UK on the grounds that:

- GVA per head is the wrong indice
- the GVA per head figures from the office of national statistics (linked to in your post) only break Wales down into 8 NUTS3 regions which do no correspond to the 22 counties of Wales. Therefore should the counties be decoupled from the regions, some of the counties in South Wales would have smaller GVA per head than Anglesey. (How he can know this when the ONS doesn't publish statistics on a county by county base is unclear.)

As the expert, could you be so kind as to let us know whether GVA per head is the relevant indice or not (you use it to make the same assertion in this blogpost) and whether Albert Owen's remarks about decoupling the NUTS3 regions are correct or not?

As we head towards the election on Thursday, I should like to post a 'fact check' of Albert's remarks.

Thanking you in advance for your time & best regards from Anglesey!
The Druid

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is...

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CREATIVE CLASSES

One of my favourite academic books of the last two decades must be the “Rise of the Creative Classes” by Professor Richard Florida.  This was one of the first detailed studies of the growing group of individuals who use their creativity and mental labour to earn a living and not only included those in arts and entertainment, but also people working in science and technology as well as knowledge-based professions such as healthcare, law, business, and finance.  Fast forward to 2022 and Professor Florida has written an updated report on the creative classes although he and his team now identify a different type of individual who is taking full advantage of the growth in digital platforms, social media, and online marketplaces.  Such ‘creators’ are defined as those who use digital technology to make and publish unique creative content, whether in the form of video, film, art, music, design, text, games, or any other media that audiences can access and respond to.  They ...

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu...