Skip to main content

NO PRISON FOR NORTH WALES?

Earlier this year, the Labour Government announced that a new prison would be built on the site of the old Friction Dynamex factory in Caernarfon.

It was said that this would create 1000 jobs, pump £17 million into the local economy and help to fill a considerable shortfall in prison places in Wales.

However, last Tuesday, the Ministry of Justice announced that the factory site was unsuitable for a prison development, allegedly due to land contamination issues, and that it was now looking for other suitable sites in Wales.

The loss of such a major project is a bodyblow to the local economy and one has to wonder what on earth is going on when a government department changes its mind so quickly on such a crucial issue without any proper explanation.

Certainly, there is a clear case for a prison in the region, given that the Ministry of Justice itself has estimated there is a shortage in North Wales of around 800 places.

The question is whether the site fulfilled the criteria set down by the Ministry for Justice which includes the following factors: be an absolute minimum of fifteen acres; close to or within large conurbations; within one hour of key courts in the region; have reasonable access to public transport and to major roads; and preferably be located on a brownfield site where any contamination should be manageable.

Therefore, if the estimated cost of £24 million for decontaminating the land was the main barrier for cancelling this project in Caernarfon, then you have to wonder why on earth this wasn’t considered at the time of the original announcement in February, as everyone knows that such an industrial site would need considerable amounts of remediation work to make it suitable for any other use?

Indeed, David Jones, the MP for Clwyd West, asked in the House of Commons whether any account had been taken of the cost of remediation of asbestos contamination when selecting the Dynamex site as the preferred location for a new prison in Wales. The response was that the Ministry of Justice was aware that the site would attract such costs.

Given this, you have to start wondering whether this is a political decision rather than one made on the grounds of unsuitability, especially when Peter Hain waded in with the suggestion the prison should now be sited on Anglesey, one of the Labour Party's main marginals.

There is undoubtedly an economic case for such a decision which could benefit the poorest county in the UK but it would be the wrong decision to deal with the issue of prison location.

Instead, as this column pointed out a couple of weeks ago, the Secretary of State for Wales should lobby the Assembly Government to provide special status for the island to support its future development.

Of course, perhaps the wrong location was chosen in the first place. As the North Wales Probation Board and the North Wales Criminal Justice Boards indicated last year, the best location for a new North Wales prison would probably be somewhere along the A55 in either Conwy or Denbighshire.

This could provide the optimum solution for a central facility within an hour of both Crown Courts at Mold and Caernarfon and the majority of Magistrates Courts in the region. Indeed, serious consideration should be given to redundant industrial sites such as the Indesit factory in Bodelwyddan, where 320 jobs were lost when the company closed recently.

The case for a North Wales prison is unequivocal and the current situation is totally unacceptable but any decision has to be right for the needs of the prison system and not for any political expediency eight months before a general election.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Many in Wales will be glad to see the back of Hain after the next election when he and his party face years in the wilderness. What are the odds that this power mad ex-liberal will look to jump into the Assembly?

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CREATIVE CLASSES

One of my favourite academic books of the last two decades must be the “Rise of the Creative Classes” by Professor Richard Florida.  This was one of the first detailed studies of the growing group of individuals who use their creativity and mental labour to earn a living and not only included those in arts and entertainment, but also people working in science and technology as well as knowledge-based professions such as healthcare, law, business, and finance.  Fast forward to 2022 and Professor Florida has written an updated report on the creative classes although he and his team now identify a different type of individual who is taking full advantage of the growth in digital platforms, social media, and online marketplaces.  Such ‘creators’ are defined as those who use digital technology to make and publish unique creative content, whether in the form of video, film, art, music, design, text, games, or any other media that audiences can access and respond to.  They also make their mon