Skip to main content

OIL FOR TERRORISM

There has been considerable debate over the Scottish Government’s decision to grant compassionate release to Abdelbaset Ali Mohmet al-Megrahi, the man convicted of planting the bombs that brought down the Pan Am flight over Lockerbie in 1998, causing the deaths of 270 people.

Initially, this was seen as a decision made predominantly on compassionate grounds by the Scottish Government in Edinburgh without any interventions at all from Westminster. However, during the last couple of weeks, evidence has begun to emerge that this may no longer be the case and yesterday, there were even revelations that the Libyans had even paid for the medical advice which secured the release.

Whilst prominent Libyans, such as Colonel Gaddafi’s son, had suggested that al-Megrahi had been released as part of a wider trade deal with the UK, this was initially denied, with Lord Mandelson pouring scorn on such speculation. However, as the truth threatened to come out, one of Labour’s leading ministers has since acknowledged that trade deals with Libya had actually played a ‘very big part’ in the decision to free the Lockerbie bomber.

In a wide ranging interview with a national newspaper on Saturday, Jack Straw, the Justice Minister admitted that one of the key factors in releasing al-Megrahi was merely a pawn in a multi-million oil exploration deal between Libya and BP.

In kowtowing to large multinational conglomerates and their greed for oil, it would seem that the Labour Government has seriously damaged our diplomatic links with the USA, one of our biggest trading partners. Many will simply not understand why anyone would put an oil deal with a dictatorship ahead of our relationship with our strongest ally.

And America is angry, in the same way that we would be if our citizens had been cold bloodedly murdered by a terrorist and the convicted perpetrator released as part of a trade deal. There has already been a call for an inquiry from leading Democratic senators to 'uncover whether justice took a back seat to commercial interests'. With an increasing number of American politicians seeing the decision to release al Megrahi as a sign of weakness against international terrorism, this could potentially escalate into the worst diplomatic freeze between the USA and the UK since the Suez Crisis of 1956.

We therefore have a British government which has put commercial imperatives before the long term security of this country and the friendship with our closest ally. We have a Prime Minister who failed to give any opinion on the release of al Megrahi and, worst of all, who stated earlier this week that there was ‘no deal on oil’, a statement which means that he is either ignorant of what his ministers are up to or he has been economical with the truth about these revelations.

Supporting trade deals in exchange for the release of a convicted terrorist is bad enough but in the middle of this international furore, many have already forgotten the British victims of Libya’s terrorism activities during the last thirty years.

These include PC Yvonne Fletcher - who was shot and killed whilst on duty outside the Libyan Embassy in 1984 - and those murdered by the IRA with weapons supplied by Libya, such as the victims of the 1993 Warrington bombings.

In jumping through hoops to satisfy a dictator’s whims, the Prime Minister and his cabinet have poured scorn on the principles of all of us who abhor terrorism whilst, at the same time, damaging the special relationship with our closest ally.

Worst of all, their actions, despite today's spectacular u-turn, have shown them to be devoid of any moral responsibility and totally insensitive to the families of those murdered by Libya during the last twenty five years. The reasons given to justify the release of al-Megrahi are simply wrong and this Government, if it to save any face both domestically and internationally, should admit it.

Comments

Robert said…
I do not know a Government that does not see Money as being more important then life, life is always cheap.
Tcoah said…
The government of Gordon Brown has acted recklessly and stupidly by releasing the convicted terrorist. This issue is not going to go away. BP might well pay a severe price in the USA. All it takes is for several Senators to put pressure on President Obama and vola, BP loses out; BP has billions tied up in American oil fields (e.g., in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska) and as such is highly exposed in the US market.
Logical Man said…
oh the blinkeredness of your post Dylan; anger at the IRA atrocities by the hands on Libyan weapons and explosives - and America is angry...etc

Just hang on a minute, wasn't it the americans who funded the bloody IRA for over two decades, wasn't it very senior USA politicians, one recently deceased, who vociferously backed the IRA?
The IRA murdered innocents with guns and bombs funded to a great degree by monies from the USA. And, remember, with weapons PURCHASED in the USA.

your quote @These include PC Yvonne Fletcher - who was shot and killed whilst on duty outside the Libyan Embassy in 1984 - and those murdered by the IRA with weapons supplied by Libya, such as the victims of the 1993 Warrington bombings@ - weapons supplied by Libya or funded by the peoples of the USA, or both?

I like visiting the USA it's a great place but their vocal and financial support for the IRA was rife - as was witnessed by my own eyes and ears in the many irish bars in NY, boston and San Fran.

Giving money 'for the cause' was akin to pulling the trigger yourself!

The people of the UK and ireland were cold bloodedly murdered by the IRA, the INLA and then the follow-on IRA...(plus the loyalist scum) the scale of which would never have reached such heights if it were not for financial and political backing of the USA.

The cowardice of the Lockerbie bomber(s) knows many an equal unfortunately - each and every murderer of an innocent. B++++++s the lot of them - as are those who fund them and push their aims in the safety of their comfortable lives. Remember, you support a 'cause' and that cause kills then you are a murderer too.

I'm suprised with your academic prowess that you chose to read only a headline and not look at the bigger picture or recent history

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

THE PERFECT STORM FACING THE UK ECONOMY

In his sublime 1997 book on the fate of the fishing boat Andrea Gale, the author Sebastian Junger defined a “perfect storm” as a rare combination of events or circumstances that results in an unusually bad situation.  This term would not be out of place in describing what is currently happening to the UK economy which is being battered on so many fronts with little respite in sight. For example, the war in Ukraine has had an unexpected impact on energy bills in Europe due to the curtailing of exports from Russia which, last year, was responsible for supplying 40% of all natural gas to the European Union. Whilst the UK is not dependent on Russia for its energy needs, the scramble by other countries to find alternative sources has resulted in higher prices globally which has impacted on the fuel imported by the UK with normal suppliers struggling to meet demand. There have also been considerable supply constraints globally which have been driven by manufacturers struggling to get their g