Skip to main content

CARDIFF ACADEMICS BANNED FROM DRINKING

According to this week's Times Higher, Cardiff University has just imposed a new policy on the use of alcohol and drugs which states that "Individuals are reminded that they should not behave outside work in a way that might bring the university into disrepute and bring into question suitability for the particular role held."

Fair enough, but it then goes on to state that not only is drinking at work is forbidden but, unbelievably "employees' homes will be considered part of the workplace when they work there".

There remains a ray of sunshine for those who imbibe as "alcohol consumption is allowed on university premises only on specific named events, such as the last working day before Christmas and "retirement recognition".

However, the catch is that "prior approval must be obtained, and staff must not return to work afterwards".

Similarly, staff need "express permission to drink at lunch-time events; those who do may not return to the office for the rest of the day". According to the rules, failure to abide by any of these terms "may result in the termination of working arrangements" i.e. the sack.

If there is an alcoholism problem among some members of staff, then certainly it needs to be addressed but this seems to be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Instead of solving the problem, this will merely exacerbate it, especially amongst the small minority who have serious alcoholic problems that should be dealt with in a sensitive and personal manner.

Given the ban on drinking at home, how will this be monitored by Cardiff's human resources department? Will staff be encouraged to shop their colleagues who are marking first year scripts over a glass of chardonnay?

Will every single employee going to their departmental Christmas parties now have to sign a form in HR? Will academics now have to gain permission from the Vice Chancellor before attending conference dinners on behalf of the University?

I think I need a drink.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is why staff have unions Dylan - you know, that lot that the Tories hate.
Anonymous said…
that is ridiculous,doesn't that contravene human rights
What about farting is that allowed ?
Could we please have a guarantee that whoever thought up this one was not acting under the influence at the time? Because they're either drunk or completely mad.

What about the pub or staff social club if they have one, is that going to have to stop offering academics booze after a research paper because they might be discussing the content of it, and therefore be at work?

Absolutely insane...
Pelagius said…
Good on you for exposing this. Just shows that British universities are run by idiots. Which fool issued this diktat? Can you imagine this happening on the mainland? Wonder if the fearless mainstream media will pick this up?
Anonymous said…
That must be a photo from our exam board. I know a 2:1 when I see one.
Phillip Fayers said…
Oh journalists - when will they learn.

The Times Higher publishes emails "leaked" to them; emails sent by "the UCU". The emails aren't published so we don't know what they said but the article states the UCU have issues with a "new" policy.

I can only guess that, in the usual way of these things, the university was in the process of discussing the policy with the UCU, and no doubt other unions. Yet the Times reports it as if this were a policy that was already in place.

Cardiff, like most workplaces, has a no drinking at work policy, its had one for quite some time. I'm guessing this an attempt to update it to reflect the reality of people working at home.

I expect the changes to policy have something to do with the fact that if your employer allows you to work at home they still have a duty of care towards you; they need to be aware of health and safety issues in the same way they would be if you were at work.

And why does no one point out the ridiculousness of arguing for the right of people to drink alchohol at work? That's a daft idea no matter where your workplace is.
Pelagius said…
I don't think it's possible to defend this, Philip Fayers. It is legal to drink and drive vehicles in the UK, n'est-ce pas? Yet, do you think it would apply to the university hierarchy?

This idea count only germinate in Binge Drink Britain where alcohol = drunk. I blame the Protestants.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its