Skip to main content

WAG PRIORITIES DURING A RECESSION NO 1 - FUNDING A NIGHTCLUB

Good to know that WAG Ministers have got their priorities right during the worst recession since the Second World War.

Today, the Finance Minister Andrew Davies announced £15 million of taxpayers funding for the arts and innovation centre at Bangor University which, according to the marketing blurb, "will include a replacement nightclub and Students’ Union for the University".

So there we have it.

With 130,000 unemployed in Wales, WAG has decided to give millions of pounds of public funds for a nightclub in Bangor.

You couldn't make it up even if you tried.

Comments

I miss Theatr Gwynedd said…
Seems that Vaughan Roderick agrees with you.

www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/vaughanroderick/2009/10/cod_da_vinci.html

Here is a translation of his post

"One would have considered that North Wales AMs would be delighted with the news that Bangor University will hope to have its new arts and innovation centre open by 2012.
That isn’t the case at all and it is not only the pseudo-Italian name “Da Vinci Centre” that has annoyed them. In the words of one, “I have no faith in them”, with the ‘them’ being the university authorities and the doubts that arose after what happened to Theatr Gwynedd
The University owned the theatre’s building but it was run by and independent board. According to one that should know, the University showed little interest in the work of the Theatr.
The sceptics in the Bay cannot believe that the panjandrums at Bangor have suddenly developed an interest in presenting the arts to the local population. In their opinion, the new theatre is just a way for the university to get a bucketful of public cash. The real reason is to develop a building that will be of greater worth to the University and its students than to local people or professional theatre in Wales.
Aberystwyth Arts Centre is an excellent example of the way that a university can develop a centre that is of national significance and of benefit to its community. There is more than one AM who doubts whether the new Dan Brown/Da Vinci Centre at Bangor will be the same.
People used to say that the “College on the hill” was built on high ground so that its leaders could look down on everyone around them. According to some, this hasn’t changed!
I am not surprised. I wrote an article for the Daily Post on November 24th 2008 which, for some reason, I didn't publish on this blog. Needless to say, Bangor University leaders were not happy but, as Vaughan points out, there are some real concerns which I also mentioned and whih remain valid. Here is the article again:

"At the end of last month, the decision to close Theatr Gwynedd for good was greeted with dismay by many people in the local community. In its place, there are plans to create an ‘Arts and Innovation Centre’, which will also incorporate a new students’ union. According to architects’ estimates, this will cost up to £30 million, with the vast majority of it coming from the public purse.

With public funding being constrained under the current credit crunch, questions have yet to be asked about whether the owners – Bangor University - had bothered to work out the cost of refurbishing the existing theatre, especially as it would probably have been considerably cheaper than the cost of the proposed new facility. Certainly, a small proportion of the £30 million would have gone a long way towards repairing the current building.

Whilst the concept of an ‘Arts and Innovation Centre’ sounds exciting in itself, it must not be forgotten that such a facility already exists nine miles down the road in Caernarfon. The Galeri - which has already received millions of pounds of public funding - is already the centre for creative industries for the region. Any similar development in such close geographical proximity would surely place its future at risk, especially as its tenant companies would no doubt be incentivised to move to Bangor.

It could be argued that the closure of Theatr Gwynedd creates a real opportunity to establish a new theatre in Caernarfon to complement the Galeri and, along with the cluster of television companies on the Cibyn Industrial Estate, would give Caernarfon the opportunity to label itself as Wales’ most creative town. Such a development may even persuade the BBC to relocate from Bangor to establish a powerful creative cluster that could generate real wealth and prosperity.

Given that replacing the local students’ union forms part of the new plans for the Arts and Innovation Centre in Bangor, some have argued that public funding earmarked for regeneration should not be used to pay for new nightclubs to attract students to the city. That is a tad unfair but the point is well made.

The whole point of building Theatr Gwynedd was to have an arts location for the whole of the North West Wales. If a decision has been made by the owners of the theatre to close it down against the wishes of local people, then they have forfeited the right to first refusal on a replacement. Any new theatre for the county must therefore complement recently built facilities such as the Galeri and more importantly, be located where it has the greatest impact.

Of course, this places the Assembly in a difficult position. If it provides funding from the Mon and Menai strategy to build a new development in Bangor that will undermine the position of Caernarfon as a centre for the creative industries, then it could be jeopardising one of the few remaining opportunities to regenerate the area. There is also talk of asking Europe for millions of pounds of funding to support the project, which some would find difficult to swallow especially as the University has already received £28 million in grants from the Objective 1 programme.

Of course, if the University wishes to invest its own surpluses in the development of the new Centre and the creation of facilities for its students then all well and good. However, if it needs vast amounts of Assembly and European money to do so, then there must be considerable reflection by politicians and civil servants as to whether this is the right strategy for the region but, most importantly, whether it is a responsible use of public funds".
Anonymous said…
I have just seen the BBC News and cannot understand how the Vice Chancellor of Bangor can describe this as a boost for North Wales. It is 'money for nothing' for a nightclub that may boost brewrey profits but little else
logicalman said…
oh come on Dylan, less of the Daily Mail headline.

Also, to say there was widespread 'dismay' in the city upon the closure of Theatr Gwynedd is stretching it as most never even noticed as nobody went! My mam still lives in that area and thought it had closed years earlier.

Looking at the bangor uni website about the new development - da vinci my a**e as Mr Royale would say - it seems quite interesting but it's a little more than a nightclub isn't it? The 'arts' are not really my cup of tea but what's being proposed to replace the ugliest building in the city (the students union) and the old fashioned nil exciting nil used theatre building can only be a good thing surely? Even if just for the feel of that part of the city - not to mention the huge student spending power, science interaction and arty drama kind of stuff.

That students union building is an absolute eyesore and sooner it goes the better for the visual impact of Bangor - never underestimate the 'feel' of a location in attracting investment, as you well know.

Does Bangor need a theatre? I doubt it to be honest but it does need something to bring the people closer to the university and especially the sciences, to better understand and possibly even take part in its/their advancement. Hopefully this will provide such a vehicle? Let's see.

The conservative mindset (no pun intended) of knocking something different is disappointing from you Dylan. Isn't innovation and entrepreneurial initiatives all about something different?
Sam said…
A terribly cheap attack, I've got to say - I expected better from you. In what way is the nightclub a drain on the local economy, what with its dozens of jobs for locals and the millions it makes, the majority of which is spent on local suppliers and contractors.
Sorry logicman blue, couldn't resist the headline (and it got your attention) but the more serious point is what exactly is being offered?

Well if you look beyond the architect’s diagram, the new project consists largely of a theatre, lecture theatres, exhibition spaces, bar and cafĂ©, a replacement nightclub and Students’ Union, and a variety of new teaching and learning spaces.

That is hardly ‘different’, ‘innovative or entrepreneurial’ and is certainly not a priority at a time of extreme budget constraints.

Yes, there is a “Music Innovation Centre” in the plans but is that really worth spending £15 million of public funds on such a project, especially as this could have been incorporated into the Galeri in Caernarfon for considerably less?

If there was a case of a building representing the phrase “the emperor has no clothes”, this is it. Indeed, as the failure of the technium buildings has shown, it is not bricks and mortar that makes the difference but the people who work within those buildings.

As the VC of one of the largest HE institutions said to me today, all these projects are well and good but what is the point if the HE sector is preparing for cuts of up to 10 per cent which will hit staff budgets hard.

Unfortunately, if you build it, they will not come because the staff budget won’t be there to pay for the academics who can do the “science interaction and arty drama kind of stuff”.

Sam – sorry to disappoint you but I never said that the nightclub is a drain on the economy but if, as you state, it makes millions of pounds, then why should the taxpayer pay for a refurbishment when there are other priorities in the Welsh economy?

For example, wouldn’t you prefer to delay this project for a couple of years and use the funding to help young people to go to university or to college rather than on the dole, or to help graduates extend their studies to a relevant Master’s so they are more highly skilled when the recession is over?

We are in the middle of a recession and every spare penny should be going towards making sure the Welsh economy is in the position to recover. This may have been the type of project to fund when the money was flowing but when the economic development budget is facing cuts in capital expenditure of £65 million next year, it doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

If the University really wants this project to go ahead then it can pay for it out of its own funds, although even with such largesse from WAG but I very much doubt that one pound of real cash will go towards this project, especially as the University has made it absolutely clear that the project will be part financed via EU Convergence funding.

Given the way that WEFO applies its rules regarding spending, I will be interested to see how much of the project is deemed eligible for support.

Anyway, that’s my opinion and thanks for your comments although that opinion is probably worth very little as this deal had allegedly been agreed months ago. Now just watch the bid for European funding sail through during the next couple of months.
Anonymous said…
The headline certainly got my attention and Dylan makes some valid points, despite the fact that he once held a chair at Bangor. The main point about this is whether public funding should be used to pay for student facilities as this is not, by any stretch of the imagination, an innovation centre. As such, I believe this project cannot be funded under European Funding Convergence rules for research and technological development. Those elements such as a cafe, theatre, lecture rooms, nightclub etc - would be deemed ineligible and only the Music Innovation Centre should receive money under this measure.
Jeff Jones said…
The real debate concerns £15 million for a university building and just £20 million for social housing throughout the whole of Wales. Any capital investment will lead to construction jobs. I work with the housebuilding industry and as anyone will know under section 106 agreements there must be a certain percentage of social housing on any new development. I can think of at least one project where the housebuilder wants to provide much needed social housing in the valleys but its housing association partner cannot get the finance. What did Nye Bevan once say about 'The language of priorities is the religion of socialism.' Even the huge amount of money going to Ebbw Vale for leisure facilities raises the question of sustainability. Where will the money come from for on going maintenance costs in the future and who will pick up the annual subsidy required to run the leisure facilities when local government budgets are facing severe cutbacks. As Ebbw Vale gets new 21st century leisure facilities my home town with a population of over 21000 faces closure of the local swimming pool which has been in existence for over 70 years because in the present climate the local council cannot find the £1 million+ required for essential refurbishment.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

THE PERFECT STORM FACING THE UK ECONOMY

In his sublime 1997 book on the fate of the fishing boat Andrea Gale, the author Sebastian Junger defined a “perfect storm” as a rare combination of events or circumstances that results in an unusually bad situation.  This term would not be out of place in describing what is currently happening to the UK economy which is being battered on so many fronts with little respite in sight. For example, the war in Ukraine has had an unexpected impact on energy bills in Europe due to the curtailing of exports from Russia which, last year, was responsible for supplying 40% of all natural gas to the European Union. Whilst the UK is not dependent on Russia for its energy needs, the scramble by other countries to find alternative sources has resulted in higher prices globally which has impacted on the fuel imported by the UK with normal suppliers struggling to meet demand. There have also been considerable supply constraints globally which have been driven by manufacturers struggling to get their g