Skip to main content

WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE FOR THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN WALES.

I hate to say I told you so, but given that the Welsh Assembly Government's economic department lives in a sort of cotton wool world where they seem to be totally divorced from the reality of the real world, I thought I would repost an article I wrote nearly three years ago.

It says a lot about the arrogance and complacency of those leading our economy that, even before the recession, they were in complete denial over the declining state of the manufacturing sector in Wales.

When a good number of us were warning that we needed to improve the offer to the manufacturing sector, our concerns fell on the usual stony ground.

Even now, when David Melding repeats his regular call for a manufacturing strategy for Wales, it is ignored by those who think they know best.

Read the article and weep.


Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Shutting the gate after the horse has bolted

Last week, the news broke that yet another manufacturer in Wales was shedding jobs as a result of the changing nature of the marketplace.Aykroyd’s of Bala, which makes children’s nightwear, announced the loss of 66 jobs in a rural area which can ill afford to have increased unemployment.

Indeed, one could argue that the proportional impact of such an announcement in South Gwynedd is as high, if not higher, than the job losses that will come as a result of the Burberry closure in Treorchy.

Could such an announcement have been avoided? Well, it is been an open secret here in North Wales that the company has been struggling of late and, earlier this year, was forced to cut its production by almost half due to a drop in demand.

The question from the point of view of Assembly intervention is whether they had any discussions with the business when such problems were becoming apparent. Certainly, there is the impression that the Assembly only steps in after the ‘horse has bolted’ and an Assembly spokesman responded to the closures at Aykroyd by stating that "We will be seeking a meeting with the company at the earliest opportunity to discuss this announcement.

Perhaps I am being naïve here, but surely the time to seek a meeting with a company in difficulty is before they announce jobs cuts not after? Indeed, if you look at all the recent closures that have happened in Wales, which have amounted to thousands of manufacturing jobs lost in the last twelve months, the Assembly always moves in only after a restructuring or redundancy situation.

Yet, I would agree with the Wales TUC that many Welsh manufacturers, if given the right investment and training support, can survive and prosper, although it would seem that such support is only available after they have made a strategic decision to downgrade or close their operations.Clearly, there is a lack of intelligence within the Assembly Government on the current business situation of many of these businesses in Wales.

I would find it hard to believe that there is no ongoing dialogue with major employers in Wales but it would seem that every time an job loss announcement is made, our politicians seem to be caught like the proverbial rabbit in headlights with the usual reaction that ‘Team Wales’ will move in to clear up the mess.

Wouldn’t it be more sensible to set up a system where civil servants are in regular contact with the largest employers in Wales and are monitoring their current position? For example, if an American-owned medium-sized manufacturer is looking to move its operations and close down a plant in Wales, then there could be options to closure, such as a management buy out, which the business could consider.

Certainly, putting a Team Wales approach in place then, with money from Finance Wales, support from business development specialist such as GAMBIT, training grants from DELLS, grant support from the Department of Enterprise, and manufacturing advice from private sector organisations such as SA Partners, could secure jobs for the future.

At the very least, it is about time that a better relationship was built with the major employers in Wales and that an open door policy was enacted between the managing directors of these firms and senior politicians and civil servants.

For example, statistics suggest that there are around 1200 firms in Wales employing more than 50 people, with a total turnover of £29 billion pounds and overall employment of 275,000 people.

Now, if I was working in the Assembly, I would certainly be monitoring the health of such major employers and wealth creators in Wales and ensuring, through regular meetings, that they could get access to the support they require for their further development.

Perhaps the place to start is to undertake a baseline audit of all these businesses to determine their current situation and ensure that there will be no more job shocks in the near future. Certainly we have enough civil servants within the Assembly to undertake such an important task.

Building up a business to become a significant local employer takes many years but announcing redundancies takes less than minute, a situation that could easily be avoided if the business had alternative scenarios for its future supported proactively by business support agencies.

I certainly hope that the Assembly Government can find the resources to ensure that there are individuals that such businesses can approach immediately if major redundancies or closures are being considered, especially if routes such as succession planning or management buyouts could be utilised through greater co-operation with the private sector.

Comments

Anonymous said…
A great but sad post. It doesn't matter what WAG does until it changes the people at the top as they have no vision and don't understand business
Anonymous said…
Read em and weep ...........
Anonymous said…
Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy.
WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted.
I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG.
If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....
I appreciate that there is a need to keep the government in check, but please Dylan, stop trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes to make political points.....you are much better than that.
Ah yes, the 'manufacturing strategy' which has yet to see the light of day outside of the forum.

Does it exist yet as it would seem that very few people have seen a copy? Certainly, Assembly members have yet to discuss it which is why Conservative AMs have been asking WAG for its publication.

If it is still in draft form, could you explain why it has taken two and a half years to release the strategy, as I believe the Manufacturing Forum was set up in late 2006/early 2007.

If it hasn't been published anywhere, how can I comment on it, which of course, I didn't in this article. Indeed, I would be interested where you disagree with the article from 2007. Are you happy with how WAG deals with major employers in Wales and if so, why?

In terms of the strategy, if you could send us a link, then everyone could look at it and examine it further. Once I have read it in detail, I would be happy to discuss it with anyone.

The simple fact of the matter is that we have seen manufacturing firm after manufacturing firm close down in Wales over the last decade.

Why?

It is because manufacturing has not been taken seriously enough by those in power and which is why we have seen the sector decline by almost 10 per cent over this period in its importance to the welsh economy.

Rather than being an apologist for WAG, why don't you look at their record in supporting the sector.

It is pitiful.

Finally, why don't you enlighten the rest of us whom you assume to be ignorant of such matters on how this 'strategy' has supported the manufacturing sector in Wales during the last twelve months?

I am sure there thousands of now redundant manufacturing workers across the country who would be very interested in your answer.
Anonymous said…
I have not got an e-copy of the strategy to post today, but I will look if one available to me.
The simple fact of the matter is that we were not happy that WAG took so long to support the strategy. We argued that in this economic decline, the strategy was more important than ever. However, we were happy with the actual strategy.
WAG have finally listened. Although belated, they are supporting the strategy.
I recall conservative AMs questioning evidence givers at committee last year. Asking if WAG had taken action on the manufacturing strategy. If this helped in pushing WAG to act, then I'm grateful. But, now WAG are actually acting upon the strategy lets see how this develops.
There's no point in calling for a new strategy when there's one already there. It was written by the manufacturing sector and the sector is happy with it. I would rather this approach than WAG writing one for us!
The main problem was the time WAG took to support the strategy. Now they have, lets support it - at the end of the day, it was written by manufacturers as a way to support the sector.
I have responded appropriately in the following blog entry and can I thank you for taking the time to respond.

If other people had the same passion about their sector, then this country would be in a far better state than it is today.

My frustration is not with the manufacturing forum - far from it - but with WAG's continuing prevarication and delays over this issue.

You say that there is already a manufacturing strategy and that WAG is supporting it.

However, according to senior WAG officials, this is having to be rewritten to take into account of "credit conditions" and won't be ready for publication until March 2010 and will only be implemented as part of the economic renewal programme.

If that is the case, then can I urge you to send a copy not only to me but to all the members of the Enterprise and Learning Committee.

I believe they would be fascinated to know exactly what the Forum has planned for the manufacturing sector in Wales as, to date, they have had no real information whatsoever. Indeed, it would be good to know why WAG refused to implement the original draft strategy - the recession seems to be a convenient excuse more than anything else.


Only then will ordinary AMs be able to press the Government to make sure that your strategy, which has been written by manufacturers for manufacturers, will be implemented.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is...

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CREATIVE CLASSES

One of my favourite academic books of the last two decades must be the “Rise of the Creative Classes” by Professor Richard Florida.  This was one of the first detailed studies of the growing group of individuals who use their creativity and mental labour to earn a living and not only included those in arts and entertainment, but also people working in science and technology as well as knowledge-based professions such as healthcare, law, business, and finance.  Fast forward to 2022 and Professor Florida has written an updated report on the creative classes although he and his team now identify a different type of individual who is taking full advantage of the growth in digital platforms, social media, and online marketplaces.  Such ‘creators’ are defined as those who use digital technology to make and publish unique creative content, whether in the form of video, film, art, music, design, text, games, or any other media that audiences can access and respond to.  They ...

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu...