Skip to main content

THE ECONOMIST AND THE GENERAL ELECTION IN WALES

"Here be Dragons" is a fascinating article in the Economist comparing the current fortunes of the Conservative Party in Wales with the situation in Scotland.

The fact that the bible of the finance world has bothered to examine the current political situation in Wales makes it worthwhile.

However,it is pertinent, with all the navel gazing that goes on within Wales on politics, to have an outsider's views on the reasons as to why the Welsh political landscape is changing:

"The first is that although the Welsh language flourishes (arguably because Welsh-medium schools offer a way for richer parents to enjoy academic selection), the region remains close to England, sharing, for example, the English press. (The Scots have their own newspapers.) And plenty of English newcomers are learning Welsh, drawn by those same good schools.

Migration matters too: hordes of English folk, greying and otherwise, have crossed the Severn Bridge, passing Welsh youngsters heading the other way. The Office of National Statistics notes steady migratory “churn”: in most of the past decade Wales has received and despatched more British migrants than Scotland, despite the latter’s larger population. Even Plaid no longer appeals to the “Welsh”, referring instead to the “people of Wales”.

As important, Plaid has proved much feebler than Mr Salmond’s SNP. The party struggles to pose as an alternative to Labour, not least because the two share power in the Welsh Assembly. Plaid’s pedestrian leader, Ieuan Wyn Jones, lacks the prickly charisma of Mr Salmond, which may explain why recent polls give the Welsh party a measly 9% of the vote.

That has opened space for the Lib Dems (who have done well, grabbing control of many urban councils) and the Tories. Proportional representation in assembly elections has kept both parties visible, even when their popularity was low. For the Tories, especially, assembly elections helped them to rebrand their party as local, for example by fielding more Welsh-speaking candidates. A Conservative in Cardiff calls his assembly members “dynamic, modern, pragmatic…it’s a very important point that we can’t be seen as a rural English party.”

I am sure there will be some (particularly in one party) who will disagree with the article, but with a week to go until we choose a new government, at least it demonstrates that Welsh seats in the tightest general election for eighteen years could be having a disproportionate influence on May 7th when the ballot boxes are opened and, more importantly, the rest of the World may be finally taking notice.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You seem to really like the article. LOL! I would describe myself as right of centre but your salivating over an article which takes such pleasure in Wales being diluted by English in-migration means I could never vote for you or your party. Thanks for reminding me.

NB Let me make a prediction. Next election after this one.....your no of MP's in Wales will be greatly reduced.
Alwyn ap Huw said…
In commending this report do you agree with the statement that "Welsh-medium schools offer a way for richer parents to enjoy academic selection"?

A few months ago you were complaining about the difficulties you had encountered in obtaining Welsh Language education for your own children in Cardiff. Was the problem that you just aren't rich enough?
Peter's Permatan said…
The Plaid lot are getting really sensitive. Maybe they should concentrate more on getting their voters out instead of making personal attacks on Guto and yourself.

Plaid Cymru= the Nasty Party
Anonymous said…
"Plaid’s pedestrian leader, Ieuan Wyn Jones, lacks the prickly charisma of Mr Salmond, which may explain why recent polls give the Welsh party a measly 9% of the vote."

Ieuan who?
justin davies said…
Can't say I disagree with the article (except on the subject of Welsh education - I smell ignorance in that paragraph). Don't quite understand why you think it's "fascinating" though. I would have thought "a bit obvious" would be more accurate.

I do wonder if there is a link between the second and third paragraphs, though. If IWJ shared Mr Salmond's "prickly charisma", I wonder if there would be a reactionary vote from the hordes of English folk (can I use the word hordes? I think a Nationalist would be castigated for using that kind of language!).

While I would never vote for a British party in a London election, I think that the assembly has done wonders for the Tories, in that they have become much more Welsh at a devolved level. A Welsh right of centre party in the Assembly could very well get my vote.
Peter's Permatan said…
Seems there is something in the water up in Conwy. Oscar has just posted on PC Phil losing his rag with farmers over his police pension

PLAID=LABOUR=DISASTER
Unknown said…
Having an outside perspective is great (as is attention for Wales in the Economist) but the writer has called a fair few things wrong.

Plaid's 9% poll rating comes from the aftermath of the first TV leaders' debate. The day before the leader's debate their poll rating was 14% which would generate their best Westminster result ever.

So to suggest that the coalition with Labour is responsible for the 9% is clearly wide of the mark. Particularly as the Economist's own graph backs me up.

In fact, I was just about ready to hate the article and blog about it until I read the final paragraph, which I completely agree with and which Dylan has omitted from his blog post-
"Whoever triumphs in Westminster, cuts in public spending are bound to cause resentment in both regions. In Wales a chance will soon come to voice that in a referendum, due within a year, on whether its assembly should get more primary lawmaking powers. In Scotland Mr Salmond will hope to channel anger against London in a long-planned referendum on full independence. Support for that has been waning recently, but it could yet rebound. For the Tories, whatever their hopes in the short term in Wales and Scotland, the longer-term outlook may be grim."
Anonymous said…
Gosh, as much as 9% for Plaid? Why?!

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu