Skip to main content

GOING GOING.....

I had a couple of phonecalls yesterday suggesting that the Director General for the Department of Economy and Transport was about to stand down from his position and was being moved sideways to oversee a "special project". 

There have been no official confirmations yet from the Welsh Assembly Government but given the way the jungle drums are beating loud and clear, there is little reason to believe that this rumour is not true. 

Given the criticisms that have been levelled at the senior management within the Department of Economy and Transport, including this article on Saturday, this revelation would not be a surprise. 

It may even justify awarding Andrew Davies the AM of the Year title at Monday's Welsh Political Awards!

One can only hope that Ieuan Wyn Jones now has the courage and foresight to avoid recruiting the successor from the rest of the senior management team in his department and will go out to open advert to fill one of the most important jobs in the Welsh civil service. 

Unfortunately, I very much doubt that will be the case.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Confirmed in the Western Mail today.

But it looks like IWJ will not go outside for a new head of the economy department.
Bonnie Boy said…
Ahhh, the old ‘sideways-shift’ manoeuvre: What with Sharon Linnard going a similar way previously, the DET appears to be in danger of making more sideways moves than a primary school Chess game.

Let’s hope this isn’t just a placatory ‘cop-out’. If a ship hits an iceberg: it’s no good just sacking the captain and saying, “We’ve done all we can”… you still have to stop the ship from sinking!

In fact, I’ve heard that James Cameron, the Hollywood Director, is so fascinated by the future of the Welsh economy, that he has approached Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet to star in a new movie about it.

Any suggestions for a title?
Anonymous said…
James Price will take up Mr Hall’s director general role on a temporary basis
Good thing you didnt put money on it Dylan
Anonymous said…
The Welsh Political Awards!!!!!!!!

This has to be the most arrogant self congratulatory event I have ever heard of; when Wales has gone backwards in terms of education, health and economic development standards since it was elected.

If Fleet Street was interested they would be taking the p***.
Unknown said…
"Wales has gone backwards in terms of education, health and economic development standards since it was elected."

Since who was elected?

You might have a point about the awards but in absolute terms not all of those standards have gone backwards.
Anonymous said…
James Price does not have the support of the business community. I would go so far as to say that he isn't trusted in the slightest. He openly criticised IWJ in the past and made it obvious he disagrees with the Minister. Exactly the wrong person to do the job.

He lost respect of the business community too as he treated Business Wales with contempt, refusing to attend meetings to explain the scrapping of the M4 relief road and would not answer emails or request when he was in charge of the national transport strategy.

I hear he did not go down well at the first Council for Economic Renewal last week (the new BPC/Economic Summit structure). There was rumour about the future of Gareth Hall at the meeting as he did not speak and James Price did all the talking.

Tracey Burke is in a far better position to take over than James. Business reps do not like him or trust him. IWJ should not trust him either as he obviously disagrees with him. A civil servant should not have this much power. Andrew Davies' warning could be true again. Gareth Hall, despite the fact I think he's completely ineffective, is better than James Price. God help us if he gets promoted on a permanent basis.
Anonymous said…
the latest rumour is that one of the central components of the new Wales ERP - WAG's future path to economic prosperity - is dead, that being the new concept of government providing repayable finance to business (rather than giving out grants). Apparently there are legal barriers to implementing it. One for you to verify Dylan?
Anonymous said…
There is no problem in principle with non interest bearing loans other than WAG may have to have a credit licence.

The problem is the effect on gearing, making it even more difficult (if that were possible) for companies to obtain subsequent bank loans for expansion.

For some start-up companies bank loans and grant used to form a popular mix of funding. Probably not any longer.

Most loan risk assessments will take place centrally in London - not in Wales. Their computerised risk scoring systems will not be capable of taking in to account the softer nuances of the new ERP funding.

Some of the funding for business support, such as R&D grants (which incidentally will now be repayable in Wales but not in England where they are also available), is that they are European funded. Repayment - if after the end of the particular tranche of Convergence funding - would therefore be back to Europe, not to WAG.

If there are issues with the repayable grant, then blame falls fairly and squarely on the civil servants in DE&T who failed to examine the implications of the changes and advise the Minister accordingly.

Unfortunately WAG does not appear to have a capable Sir Humphrey able and willing to gently persuade the Minister that he has no clothes.
I have thought hard about the comments section on this post.

I am not going to stop people commenting but there is a line which should not be crossed. I am happy for people to give their opinion but no personal comments please.

Having known James since he was in the WDA Economics Department, it will be interesting to see what sort of job he makes of this temporary position. Obviously having an economist rather than a town planner in charge of the economy will result in a very different style.

However, I still believe that WAG should go to open advert. If none of them are better than James, then at least he will be in a far stronger position than he currently finds himself in.

James Price and I have always had a cordial relationship and it is worth noting that he was not part of the original ERP team but was brought in after the strategy was written to try and implement the strategy.

In that respect, he is doing his job, but some have told me that if he had been involved from the beginning, then at least we would have had some economic coherence throughout the document.

Perhaps, unlike his predecessor, he may be willing to have an open discussion about the ERP and its faults with organisations such as the FSB.

Anyway, we shall wait and see.
as for repayable grants, I haven't heard anything about this. Of course, what is interesting is that WAG is probably one of the first economic development bodies to offer such "repayable grants" and there is no precedent in place elsewhere.

Finance wales did offer interest free loans as part of their spin-out programme a number of years ago but I have never seen anything else in this area.

I shall do some digging.
Anonymous said…
Repayable Grants are NOT new.

The first semi/part repyable grant was offered (to one of my cases) in 2004. I have fought every single one of my cases against such a policy, since.

One of the reasons being that the trigger point for repayment was when the company had hit a sales target. Yes very unscientific.

Most clients were very uncomfortable having to repay over and above the debt they had already secured for the project.

To date, sources tell me not one single repayment has been made (that's in 6 years).

I'm tempted to ask (publicly) how many cases have WAG turned round since 1 September i.e. start of D&T finance, because I know there haven't been many.

As you predicted Dylan most SMEs don't fit the 6 sectors.
Anonymous said…
Looks like the business guide for SMEs will be launched by DE&T in the morning. How much input did this have from business?

Will be interesting to see what they think will be their offer to SMEs as a result of the ERP.

From what I know, these repayable grants will only be offered to businesses in the six sectors. Farce!

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu