Skip to main content

BRING BACK THE WDA?

Who would have thought that a quango that many thought was dead and buried would be hitting the political headlines last week.

Yes, it would seem that there are those who still yearn after the Welsh Development Agency (WDA), the body that for many years was responsible for delivering economic development in Wales, mainly through the attraction of overseas inward investors.

However, it would seem that the current First Minister is not a fan and will certainly not be entertaining any thoughts of bringing back the WDA.

Indeed, in a response to a question in the chamber of the national Assembly for Wales, Carwyn Jones stated that the “The WDA had its day 20 years ago. But for the whole of the last decade, and most of the ’90s, it delivered absolutely nothing.”

That is not too surprising, given that he was a member of the Government that abolished the body back in 2006, a decision that was supported by Plaid Cymru at the time.

Yet it would seem from their party conference over the weekend that there has been a change of heart from the Party of Wales on the WDA, with their leader Leanne Wood stating that she would be looking to create a new private sector-led body that will proactively seek opportunities to invest European funds, other public funds and private capital for the maximum long-term economic benefit of Wales.

And whilst not calling directly for the WDA to be recreated, as the Welsh Conservatives have done in the past, this new organisation does sound remarkably similar to the way in which the WDA operated over its lifetime.

However, trying to recreate an organisation that focused predominantly on bringing in large companies to replace jobs lost in the coal and steel industries may not be relevant to today’s Welsh economy where entrepreneurship and innovation are the key factors in driving forward competitiveness.

In that respect, rather than hankering for the revival of an organisation whose best days, according to the First Minister, were already behind it when it was abolished, perhaps our politicians should be looking to other small successful economies for inspiration.

For example, Finland is regularly noted as one of the most competitive and innovative economies in the World and one of the main factors behind its success has been a specific government body that has driven and developed innovation throughout the Finnish economy.

Established in 1983, TEKES is responsible for administering public support for private and public sector R&D and innovation in Finland and whilst its programmes have been focused very much on supporting technology within companies and public institutions, there have been additional positive effects such as increased networking between companies and R&D organisations in targeted clusters and increased collaboration between researchers across different disciplines.

Its impact has been tremendous, being responsible for supporting more than half of Finnish innovations during the last thirty years, and there are certainly lessons for Wales from this experience.

For example, the WDA’s focus on attracting large foreign direct investment did little to support the long-term innovation performance of our nation. Its subsequent integration into the Welsh Government has also had a minimal impact on ensuring that Wales becomes the “small clever nation” which Assembly members have been calling for since the advent of the National Assembly.

Indeed, if politicians really want a body that can impact on the Welsh economy, then they should get on the first plane to Helsinki and find out how they could establish a Welsh TEKES that would focus on developing the innovative potential that exists within this nation.

And if we were to get only a fraction of the success that the Finnish economy has enjoyed during the last three decades, then it would be one of the more astute policy decisions that any political party in Wales could make in developing the Welsh economy.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu