Skip to main content

THE SUCCESS OF COCA COLA - THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT

On a recent visit to the USA, one of the more interesting and just slightly work-related trips was to the Coca Cola Museum in Atlanta, which is a shrine to the world's most famous fizzy drink invented by a local pharmacist back in 1886.

When it was first introduced, only nine servings per day were sold in Atlanta. Today, there are an estimated 1.9 billion daily servings globally of Coca Cola.

It is an incredible business story that demonstrates how to build a global organisation.

The company created a unique distribution system which meant that Coca Cola could be manufactured simply and quickly anywhere in the world.

It designed iconic bottles that added to the uniqueness of the product and the company's emphasis on marketing means that the Coca-Cola brand is worth around $80bn, the sixth most valuable in the world. In fact, it is a truly globalised business that today sells over 500 beverage brands are sold in more than 200 countries.

But the whole success of this empire is built on the original Coca Cola drink that is based on a secret formula that has remained hidden for nearly 130 years.  And this intellectual property was the foundation for the early success of the company which led to its global domination in the soft drinks industry today.

So, given this, there would be no way that Coca Cola would change this winning formula?

Unfortunately, that's exactly what they did back in 1986 on the hundredth anniversary of the company's beginnings.  In a radical move, executives decided to bring in a 'New Coke' to replace the original recipe. It would be a sweeter drink than the original classic formula and would come with new packaging and a new logo.

So what happened?  According to Time Magazine, this became "one of the worst marketing blunders in history." Coca Cola had become an iconic brand not only in the USA but all over the world and campaigns were started to bring back their favourite drink. The press turned against the company, over 40,000 letters were received in complaints and even the Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, who was partial to the odd glass of Coca Cola, was allegedly outraged.

Within 79 days, the original Coca-Cola was reintroduced, this time with "Classic" on the label and, after a few years, the new brand was quietly discontinued. Despite taste tests showing that most drinkers preferred the new flavour, the company had underestimated their customers' loyalty to a brand many had grown up with.

But ironically, this experiment eventually worked out brilliantly for Coca Cola.  It made the company realise that it had loyal customers globally that were prepared to stick with a product that was a century old because it represented something special to them.

As a result, most of the marketing from Coca Cola since has not emphasised the drink itself but its links with experiences, happiness and wellbeing.  Another key decision was to admit they had made a mistake and, despite the results of comprehensive focus group testing which preferred the new drink, reintroduce the old Coca Cola as soon as possible.

Not surprisingly, given the uplift in the sales of Coca Cola as a result of the furore, some conspiracy theorists alleged that Coke had done this deliberately as a marketing trick to increase sales when they eventually reintroduced the old brand. But as the President of Coca Cola said at the time "We’re not that dumb, and we’re not that smart”.  Certainly, in getting rid of their old formula, Coca Cola set out to change the soft drinks industry in the USA one hundred years after the start of the business and whilst they certainly did that, it was in completely unexpected way.

But perhaps the most important lesson from Coca Cola's experience is to never underestimate your customers and how much they value your business. It is certainly a lesson that all companies, large and small, should certainly not forget today.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its