Skip to main content

MENTAL HEALTH IN THE WORKPLACE


The issue of mental health within the workforce has become a key concern for many employers over the last 12 months. More relevantly, both the UK and Welsh Governments have recognised that this issue is one in which they can intervene by promoting better wellbeing within both public and private organisations.

A report last year by Monitor Deloitte - the multinational strategy consulting practice of Deloitte Consulting - showed the extent of this problem within the UK and, more relevantly, the negative impact on the UK economy.

It estimated that poor mental health costs UK employers between £33 billion and £42 billion each year which is made up largely of absence from work (£8 billion), presenteeism i.e. attending work whilst ill and therefore not performing at full ability (£17 billion-£26 billion) and employee turnover due to mental health (£8 billion).

Whilst the public sector makes up roughly a fifth of the UK labour force, it is responsible for around a quarter of the total costs of mental health, with the highest average cost per employee to be found in the health sector. Within private businesses, the highest annual costs of mental health per employee are in the finance, insurance and real estate industry.

What is worth noting that whilst the average workplace absence per employee has declined over the last decade, the proportion of days lost due to poor mental health (stress, depression, anxiety and other serious mental health problems) has actually increased.  However, it has been suggested that this may actually be an under-estimation of this issue due to the fact that many employees may be unwilling to talk about their problems because of  stigma and embarrassment with employers having a lack of understanding about mental health symptoms.

Whilst there may be a problem with those with mental health issues taking time off work, there is increasing concern over how presenteeism (in this case attending work whilst ill with poor mental health) is affecting the productivity of many organisations. A recent study showed that around 70 per cent said that they had experienced poor mental health at their current employer although only 40 per cent of these respondents had taken any time off  for their mental health issues.

This is a growing problem and the report estimates that mental health-related presenteeism costs employers up to three times the cost of mental health-related absence. And its costs are increasing due to changes in the workplace – such as perceived job insecurity and an increase in remote working – which are causing difficulties to employees.

In terms of staff turnover, recent data shows that as more people choose to leave their employer voluntarily and spend less time, on average, at each employer, mental health related turnover costs increase. This, in turn, incurs greater expenditure due to the expense in finding the right candidate and the increased entry costs of lost output as the new employee gets up to speed.

As poor mental health and wellbeing can impact an individual’s ability to thrive at work and earn a living, there are obviously tangible benefits for those organisations that develop a positive strategy to identify and support individuals who bring their mental health problems to work with them as well as providing mentally healthy working conditions.

For example, a systematic review of previous research shows that the return on investment (ROI) of workplace mental health interventions is overwhelmingly positive with a payback of over £4 for every £1 invested. The most effective are reactive one-to-one mental health support (ROI of 5:1), proactive mental health support (ROI of 6:1) and organisation-wide culture or awareness raising (ROI of 8:1).

In fact, the study showed that the most effective tool was a multi-component health promotion intervention which included a health risk appraisal; personalised health and well-being report; access to a personalised health, well-being and lifestyle web portal (including interactive online behaviour-change programmes; and information packs on the four most prevalent health risks namely stress management, sleep improvement, nutritional balance and physical activity. The question for many employers in the UK is how many actually are proactively utilising any of these interventions, never mind all of them?

Therefore, the Deloitte study shows clearly that mental health is an increasing challenge for more organisations in the UK but it is a challenge that can be managed with the right interventions. 
And whilst policymakers are still largely focusing on developing interventions in production and management practices to deal with lower rates of productivity, this report clearly indicates that focusing on the improved mental wellbeing of individual workers can also make a significant difference to developing a more productive UK economy.
















Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu