Skip to main content

LESSONS FROM MASS CHALLENGE


This week, I was delighted to be back in the USA with a brilliant group of Welsh start-ups to work with one of the world’s leading universities, namely the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The aim of the visit was to understand some of the key aspects of the innovation ecosystem developed around MIT and, more importantly, to understand whether there were any lessons from their experiences for the Welsh economy.

The city of Boston and its surrounding areas is now seen as one of the primary innovation regions in the World, not least because of the technology that emerges from over fifty academic institutions including MIT and the world class Harvard University.

These universities also teach those talented young people who are not only in demand from large corporates such as Google, IBM, Facebook, Amazon and Uber but who are increasingly looking to set up their own businesses. Indeed, the United States Chamber of Commerce named Boston as the best American city for fostering entrepreneurial start-ups in both 2016 and 2017.

These budding entrepreneurs also have access to funding, with Boston ranked fourth in the world for venture capital (behind San Francisco, San Jose and New York) with £35 billion invested between 2010 and 2017 in high growth sectors such as life sciences and digital health.

But one of the reasons that the region around MIT has become one of the world’s leading areas for new businesses and technologies is that the university is not alone in supporting this and there is a vibrant innovation ecosystem that brings together large firms, entrepreneurs, equity investors, academics and government in a seamless partnership where the sum of the parts is greater than the whole.

That is why a visit to a large refurbished warehouse building in the docks area of Boston last Tuesday was of particular interest as it encompassed this model perfectly.

During the economic downturn in 2008, two strategy experts working at the global consultancy Bain and Co had a vision of a creative, inspired society in which everyone is empowered and has the resources to maximize their impact. To achieve this, they set up a new type of organisation to make it as easy as possible for entrepreneurs to launch and grow new ventures.

So in 2010, they launched MassChallenge, an accelerator programme which would focus on creating a movement to support entrepreneurship and putting value creation at the heart of the global economy.

Like all accelerators, it would support early-stage, growth-driven companies for a fixed period of time (four months) and, through an intensive programme of education, mentoring and financing, would ‘accelerate’ their development into viable investor-ready businesses that could create jobs and wealth both locally and globally.

However, unlike many accelerators it would be not-for-profit, provide free co-working space, would not take equity in the businesses (which could also be based in any sector of the economy) and the intellectual property would remain in the hands of the founders of the business.

The tenants within MassChallenge would also get the opportunity to partner with top businesses and organisations to solve key challenges related to their industry as well as winning a part of £2 million in cash prizes provided by an impressive group of global firms.

Given the cut-throat world of investment in high technology ventures, many would have doubted if such an altruistic approach would actually work but yet it has. In fact, during the last nine years, it has supported more than 1600 start-ups which have raised more than £2.3 billion in funding, generated more than £1.5 billion in revenue, and created more than 80,000 total jobs.

And given that only around a quarter of firms survive the first five years, 86 per cent of those emerging from MassChallenge are still active and have attracted further rounds of funding (with a fifth raising £1.2 million or more). In fact, research from MIT has shown that start-ups that participate in the programme are two and half times more likely to raise at least £400,000 in funding and are three times more likely to reach at least 15 employees.

It is also worth noting that given the well-documented problems in getting more women involved in tech start-ups, 42 per cent of MassChallenge’s accelerated start-ups have been founded by women, raising nearly £300 million in funding in the last nine years. This has been largely down to the creation of a Women Founder's Network which has provided female founders with the support, networking, and connections to grow their businesses.

Could such an approach work in Wales?

Certainly, there is no guarantee that adopting a full-scale model would operate successfully in our economy, especially as the London version of the programme was recently shut down.

However, many of the individual elements of the Mass Challenge model - especially the competitive prizes, links with corporates and a focus on women-led start-ups - could be of benefit in improving not the quality of new Welsh firms but, more importantly, in ensuring that they are ready for further investment in the future.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu