Skip to main content

ENSURING A FAIR DEAL ON R&D FOR THE WELSH ECONOMY

With the UK moving towards an unsatisfactory agreement on Brexit, many are wondering what is the future for the UK economy after we leave the European Union.

With much of the UK Government’s attention being focused towards negotiations with Europe, there is concern that there is very little being done to prepare the economic future of this nation.
Given this, it was perhaps surprising to see a recent publication which highlighted an increased commitment to investment in research and innovation in the UK.

The so-called “Allocations Booklet” sets out the Government’s commitment to reaching the target of 2.4 per cent of GDP investment in research and development (R&D) by 2027.

To move towards achieving this target, additional investment of £7 billion in R&D has been announced between 2017 and 2022, which raises public investment in R&D to £12.5 billion per annum by 2022 and is, according to the UK Government, the biggest ever increase in public funding of R&D.

Part of this additional funding will be met from the National Productivity Investment Fund (NPIF) which includes money to enhance the UK’s position as a world leader in science and innovation and drive productivity and growth.

As this is a UK administered fund and not devolved, the question for Wales is whether we will benefit directly from this additional money being made available for improving research and innovation?
Our minimum target - assuming Wales should get 5 per cent of any central government funding pot according to the Barnett formula -  should result in around £625 million of research and innovation funding being allocated within our economy in 2022.

Many think this is highly unlikely despite the best efforts of the Welsh Government and our academic institutions unless there is a major step change in the ability of our researchers to capture higher levels of research grants and to influence the agenda on which innovation priorities the UK Government should be focusing on.

Take, for example, the fact that a significant proportion of the funding from the NPIF is focused on specific mission-oriented funding which aims to build on the UK’s competitive advantage in key areas of research and business sectors through so-called Industrial Strategy Grand Challenges.

One of the more recent funding rounds for these challenges allocated £68 million to support research and innovation in robotics and artificial intelligence systems with the aim of developing robotic solutions to make a safer working environment in industries such as off-shore energy, nuclear energy, space and deep mining, increasing productivity and opening up new cross disciplinary opportunities.

This included £45 million for four research hubs at UK higher education (supported by an additional £52 million from commercial and international partners), none of which involved Welsh universities.
Of course, some will argue this is just one isolated example and that if the expertise is not available within Welsh universities, then they shouldn’t be funded. However, as various research studies have shown, higher education in Wales has consistently received less funding for research than other parts of the UK, most notably Scotland.

And the concern is that many of these challenges drawn by the UK Government will not necessarily reflect either the research strengths of researchers here in Wales or the priorities of the Welsh Government in developing their own economic approach to stimulating innovation within the economy.

Indeed, it has been suggested that Wales’ voice is probably not being heard at the highest levels of decision making on research and innovation in the UK.

For example, the recent Reid review into government-funded research and innovation showed that whilst Wales has almost 5 per cent of the UK population, it only has about 1 per cent of the seats on the various research councils and Board within UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). In contrast, Scotland with about 8 per cent of the UK population has 11 per cent of the seats.  As a result, Wales’ ambitions and concerns will naturally be unappreciated as compared to those from Scotland.
So where does this leave Wales?

Certainly, we must ensure that the new streams of additional research funding from the UK Government does not widen the gap between Welsh research and the rest of the UK. More importantly, we must not bury our heads in the sand over this issue and hope that we will succeed without a significant effort in influencing decisions on research priorities at a UK level, which may mean increased lobbying by both the Welsh Government and the Wales Office to ensure that we are ina the position to take full advantage of these opportunities.


Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu