Skip to main content

UK PRODUCTIVITY


Politicians and policymakers have long recognised that one of the real challenges holding back the UK economy is the low level of productivity, especially when compared to our nearest competitors such as the USA, France and Germany. In fact, sixty years ago, the UK had a highest level of productivity in Europe but this has declined considerably since then.

As a result, there have been a broad array of potential solutions proposed to address this problem in the last few years including developing a highly skilled workforce, building a modern infrastructure and encouraging greater openness and competition.

As yet, it would seem there has been only a small impact on the productivity of the UK as a result of these initiatives which form a vital part of the UK Government’s Industrial Strategy.

Indeed, the latest figures from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) released last month show that for the third quarter of 2018 (July to Sept), labour productivity measured by output per hour had only grown by 0.2 per cent as compared to a year previously and was the weakest quarterly growth since 2016. Indeed, there was a decline of 0.4 per cent on the previous quarter.

As the ONS notes, this continues the ‘so-called’ productivity puzzle where rather than recovering after the recession of 2008-10 as one would have historically expected from previous trends, productivity essentially flatlined, something which has never previously happened since the end of the Second World War.

Annual growth in productivity was, before the recession, around 2.3 per cent per annum and if output per hour had continued at the same rate as it had prior to 2008, it would now be 24 per cent higher.
If we examine where there has been a growth in productivity since 2008, then the data suggests that output and labour has been moving from highly productive sectors to lower productivity sectors.

For example, whilst manufacturing and construction have made a small contribution to the growth in the output of the UK economy, the largest impact has come from non-financial services. Indeed, output per hour in the higher value added financial services sector has actually declined over the same period with key sectors such as computing, energy, finance, pharmaceuticals and telecommunications generating 60 per cent of the decline in overall productivity.

It has also been argued that another key reason for the drop in productivity is the regional gap between richer locations like London and the rest of the UK.  Indeed whereas London’s productivity is at 130 per cent of the UK average, Wales’ performance (at 84 per cent of the UK average) is the worst in the economy. Clearly it means that there needs to be a greater focus by policymakers on improving productivity outside of the more prosperous areas of the UK.

But it is interesting to note that a recent survey from the ONS of over 25,000 firms demonstrated that one of the biggest impacts on productivity came from improved management practices in businesses.
Incredibly, it found that a significant positive correlation between management practice scores and labour productivity with 0.1  increase in management was associated with a 9.6 per cent increase in GVA per worker. In particular, it was continuous improvement (i.e. how the firm monitored its operations and used this information to make it a better business) which had the biggest impact. Improved employment practices, whilst important, had a lower impact on productivity.

Given this, you have to wonder why business schools, especially here in Wales, are not focusing more of their efforts on supporting organisations to improve their management practices and why the Welsh Government is not making a greater effort to encourage them to do given the woeful performance of the Welsh economy? In fact, a survey from the Federation of Small Businesses showed that a quarter of small business owners had never undertaken specific management training with only 20 per cent having invested in external leadership and management development in the last twelve months.

And whilst an £8 million fund has been launched to boost the productivity and performance of small businesses in England and a Small Business Leadership Programme was launched in last year’s Budget to support 2,000 firms across England,  there is nothing similar to this in Wales.
Certainly, supporting Welsh businesses to invest in the development of their managers is an area of economic development that policymakers should be focusing on if we are to close the gap in productivity with the rest of the UK and, more importantly, improve its competitiveness across all sectors.



Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu