Skip to main content

GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP MONITOR 2019

This year, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) celebrates 20 years of measuring entrepreneurial activity around the World.

When the first GEM report was published back in 1999 as a joint project between London Business School and Babson College in the USA, the study initially comprised data on all the G7 nations (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, and USA) as well as Denmark, Finland, and Israel.
Over the next two decades, more than 100 different countries have worked with GEM to produce detailed studies on the state of entrepreneurship in their nations.

When GEM was expanded in 2000, I was honoured to be asked to lead the GEM study into Wales, a project that produced the first detailed analysis of entrepreneurship in the Welsh economy and which, for the first time, looked at key differences across a range of factors including start-up rates across the key regions of Wales, the effect of deprivation on enterprise and the first ever study on Welsh language and entrepreneurship.

Whilst I left the project ten years ago, the GEM Wales project – supported by the Welsh Government – continues to produce data that shapes enterprise policy for the Welsh nation.

So what exactly is GEM?

It was created to identify those factors that encourage or hinder entrepreneurial activity, especially related to societal values, individual attributes and other key economic and entrepreneurial conditions.

As a result, it would be able to assess the extent to which entrepreneurial activity influences socio- economic development across nations and regions and thus support policymakers in devising new ways of supporting entrepreneurs in their economies.

To do this, GEM undertakes a survey of at least 2,000 randomly selected adults (18-64 years of age) in each economy around the world. As a result, it provides a comprehensive set of indicators on entrepreneurship, allowing for the construction of detailed profiles of entrepreneurship in each economy studied.

More importantly, using the same methodology in each country allows direct comparisons to made of the national performance in entrepreneurial activity and, more relevantly, for economies to benchmark against each other on different aspects of entrepreneurship.

One of the real strengths of GEM is that it captures both informal and formal activity, which is far more detailed than the technique of gathering information merely on business registrations.
It also identifies societal attitudes towards entrepreneurship to identify, for example, how many are thinking of starting a business, whether entrepreneurs are valued and whether a fear of failure would stop individuals from initiating a new venture.

As a result, GEM has been able to produce global reports on important topics such as youth entrepreneurship, high growth entrepreneurship, women’s entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship, all of which have delivered important results to academics, policymakers and practitioners on the link between enterprise and economic development.

So what does the 20th GEM report  - which surveyed 49 countries including the UK - tell us about the state of entrepreneurship around the World, particularly in terms of the effect of gender and age?
The main indicator for GEM is the total entrepreneurial activity (TEA) rate which measures the period preceding and immediately after the actual start of a firm’s life.

According to this year’s study, 12.6 per cent of all adults are involved in either starting or managing a new business although there are wide variations globally ranging from a TEA of 41 per cent in Angola to 4 per cent in Cyprus. The UK has a TEA of 8 per cent, half that of the USA (16 per cent).

The impact of gender on entrepreneurship remains a major issue across the world and there remains an imperative to get more women involved in greater economic activity, including starting a business.

Unfortunately, there are only seven female entrepreneurs for every ten male entrepreneurs with only six countries showing roughly equal proportion TEA activity between men and women. A further six countries has TEA rates for women at half that for men – Greece, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and (embarrassingly), the UK.

And as for the last years of analysis, the most prevalent age group for starting a new business in the vast majority of economies is either the 25-34 or 35-44 age range.

This is because a high proportion of these age groups will have gone to university, gained some experience and may not be wedded to a career. They are also likely to understand the latest trends and have individuals in their peer groups who are entrepreneurs.

Therefore, GEM continues to measure entrepreneurship around the World and identify those key factors that can lead to greater entrepreneurial activity.

This blog entry has only touched the surface of the vast amount of information that has been produced over the years and I would urge anyone with an interest in entrepreneurship to read their incredibly detailed analyses of one one of the main driving forces for economic prosperity around the World.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu