Skip to main content

THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF SCALEUP BUSINESSES

Earlier this week, the Scale Up Institute produced its annual report into the state of high growth businesses in the UK. It showed that scaleups - those businesses growing by more than 20% per annum by employee or turnover growth (or both) – continue to make a substantial contribution to the UK economy. 

The research identified a total of 33,860 scaleups in the UK that generate a total turnover of £1 trillion which represents half of the total contribution by all UK SMEs despite making up less than 1% of the SME population. They also employed 3.5 million people and the total number of scale-ups has grown by more than 25% in the period 2013-2018. 

Scaleups also continue to be more productive than other UK businesses across almost every sector of the economy and, more importantly, exist in all sectors with most being found in wholesale and retail, professional, scientific and technical, and admin/support services. 

Whilst we have been identifying and celebrating the fastest growing Welsh firms for the last twenty two years through the Wales Fast growth 50, it is worth noting that despite initiatives such as the Accelerated Growth Programme and the creation of the Development Bank of Wales, the report shows that the Welsh economy does not perform as well as other parts of the UK in terms of developing scale-up businesses. 

This relatively low performance could be explained by the Institute’s examination  of what are the key drivers of scaleup growth in the economy.

The first is high skills namely the proportion of 16 to 24 year olds in a given area with Level 4+ qualifications. These are associated with faster scaleup growth and given this, it’s not surprising that higher levels of education and skills should be a priority for policymakers looking to boost economic performance. In addition, businesses should focus on finding skilled individuals who can transfer ideas and generate innovation.

Whilst growth can occur in any industry, the study shows that sectoral clustering and hubs have a positive effect on scaleup growth as it allows firms to share resources and transfer knowledge. Interestingly, whilst having a good cluster and proportion of businesses from a given industry does support increased scaleup growth, the analysis also shows if it becomes over concentrated in any one industry, then the growth effects are diminished as areas become reliant on that industry. This is an interesting lesson for policymakers in Wales who have had a tendency to focus on the development of a few key sectors whilst ignoring others.

Finally, the study looked at the amount raised by SMEs through equity investments per 100,000 people. It showed that areas with access to larger amounts of equity finance tend to have faster growth in the number of scaleups whereas higher levels of lending, in contrast, showing no clear relationship with scaleup growth. In other words, equity funding is a driver of scaleup growth while debt is not and highlights its importance in building scaling businesses. 

Unfortunately (and despite the best efforts of the Development Bank of Wales) there is still a concentration of equity funding in London and the South East of England and getting better access to this type of funding has to be a priority in the levelling up agenda of the UK Government going forward. 

In terms of challenges, access to markets remains the biggest issue for scaleups with 81% stating that it is a vital or very important factor in the future growth, significantly outstripping all other barriers in 2020 although access to talent also remains a key barrier to enable growth. Critical thinking is the most desired future skill, in demand by 70% of scaleup leaders although only three in ten are confident that they will be able to source employees with this vital skill in the future.

And whilst many say they are interested in working more collaboratively, only three in ten have actually worked with either large corporate or universities in the last three years. However, they are internationally-focused with half of them currently exporting with Europe remaining the main market although 42% are trading in other countries and see real opportunities in Australasia, the Middle East, China, India and the rest of Asia.

Therefore, whilst the number of scaleup businesses are growing across the UK, the performance in Wales remains lower than many of us would want to see. 

As this column suggested last week, there are interventions that can be made to encourage higher productivity amongst SMEs and the same is true of supporting those Welsh businesses that have the capacity and desire for further growth. 

Whether there should be a dedicated scaleup champion, as suggested in the report, is something that could not only be taken forward by the Welsh Government but could also be considered by the four city and growth deal regions across Wales. Certainly, given their disproportionate and positive impact on wealth creation and employment, we could do worse than to support the development of more Welsh scale ups in the future.



.





Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu