Skip to main content

INCUBATORS AND ACCELERATORS IN THE UK

Earlier this week, I attended the fifth annual conference of the UK Incubator and Accelerator Network in Birmingham. 

Established by the influential Centre for Entrepreneurs thinktank, this collective connects and represents those ventures that offer physical space to new firms (incubators), organisations that deliver start-up support programmes (accelerators) and co-working spaces that provide flexible, shared offices.

Whilst it was a real honour to be able to contribute to a panel discussing the future of the sector, one of the highlights of the conference was the presentation of the latest study examining the state of the sector and, more importantly, their role in stimulating entrepreneurship across the UK.

This research showed that the sector is thriving with round 750 incubators, accelerators and support programmes now active in the UK, a doubling of the provision since the last examination of this phenomenon back in 2017. 

Whilst London has the largest numbers of incubators and accelerators, other parts of the UK have also developed clusters including South Wales. In fact, Wales as a whole has eight accelerators identified through the study and twenty six incubators. More relevantly, it has the second highest concentration of incubators per 100,000 businesses in the UK after Oxfordshire. 

Given the role of accelerators in getting start-ups prepared for entry to market, it is not surprising that the services they offer are focused mainly on mentoring and investment readiness, networking with peers and investors, business model improvement and skills training. Whilst these were also important for incubators, the most common service provided by incubators was office space. 

This suggests that policymakers, rather than just providing funding for any business that supports new firms may want to consider how supporting these two different types of support initiatives can help develop the economy.

In terms of impact, it is estimated that across the UK, incubators, accelerators and co-working spaces now support nearly 20,000 businesses every year which equates to 5% of all new firms created annually. More importantly, these firms are likely to be focused on growth having been given tailored support and advice and therefore will end up creating employment in high value or technology-based sectors within their local areas.

Whilst rents and fees from clients are the most important source of income for incubators and corporate sponsorship is the primary source of funding for accelerators, the report shows that the public sector also contributes around one third of the funding of both types of organisation and is also critical in leveraging private funding. In addition, European Structural Funding has also been significant in supporting these initiatives, especially in the case of incubators.

Following the cessation of support after the UK’s departure from Europe, this calls into question the future viability of these initiatives and help for new businesses, especially as many incubators and accelerators were also affected by the pandemic with 81 programmes closing in the last five years. Given the physical nature of this type of support, this is not surprising and those that survived pivoted to offering online and hybrid support for their clients.

Therefore, given that incubators and accelerators are making a significant contribution to the development of new firms and, more importantly, have the potential to make an even larger contribution in the future development of knowledge-based clusters of economic activity, what should policymakers do to support them and the businesses they develop?

The first issue is that of sustainable funding as there is currently no long-term provision for the development of incubators and accelerators with many dependent on short term programmes, many of which are coming to an end after Brexit with no replacement in sight. 

This is especially the case within the post-industrial or poorer regions of the UK where there is a lack of private sector support for activities that support entrepreneurs. 

Certainly, any funding being provided through levelling up should prioritise entrepreneurship support where possible although it is also important that this does not undermine any private initiatives although, to be fair, these are likely to be more prevalent within the prosperous parts of the UK.

In addition to funding, the most important consideration for local, devolved and national government in supporting accelerators and incubators is to appreciate that whilst they can help individual start-ups to start and scale, they can also play a critical role in bringing co-ordination and cohesiveness to the local entrepreneurial ecosystem. 

Of course, this will depend on other factors such as having a professional services sector that can support high technology firms as well as experienced business angels and availability of venture capital. 

It will also need to be contextualised so that areas with low levels of start-ups -such as the South Wales Valleys - need pre-accelerators which are focused on first-time entrepreneurs at a very early stage. In contrast, more developed ecosystems can afford to have more specialised accelerators such as the Fintech Foundry that has been recently set up in Cardiff or the Alacrity Foundation in Newport.

However, what is important is new businesses need be assisted through vehicles such as incubators and accelerators. If they are given this support, and there is a coherent strategy to achieve this as part of a thriving local entrepreneurial ecosystem, then those start-ups will help to create wealth and employment in those parts of the UK that truly need it.




Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is...

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE CREATIVE CLASSES

One of my favourite academic books of the last two decades must be the “Rise of the Creative Classes” by Professor Richard Florida.  This was one of the first detailed studies of the growing group of individuals who use their creativity and mental labour to earn a living and not only included those in arts and entertainment, but also people working in science and technology as well as knowledge-based professions such as healthcare, law, business, and finance.  Fast forward to 2022 and Professor Florida has written an updated report on the creative classes although he and his team now identify a different type of individual who is taking full advantage of the growth in digital platforms, social media, and online marketplaces.  Such ‘creators’ are defined as those who use digital technology to make and publish unique creative content, whether in the form of video, film, art, music, design, text, games, or any other media that audiences can access and respond to.  They ...

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu...