Skip to main content

Remembering the D-day landings

Over last weekend, the remaining few gathered in France to commemorate the 65th anniversary of the D-Day landings.

As this was a poignant reminder of the events that turned the outcome of the Second World War, many will have been disappointed by the snub from the French Government to Her Majesty the Queen, who herself served in the forces during the war.

By not inviting the Head of State of the United Kingdom, President Sarkozy has been accused of demoting our country’s sacrifices in liberating his own and, worse still, of seemingly basing his entire history of the Normandy landings on the film “Saving Private Ryan” in order to curry favour with his American guests.

Of course, no-one should deny that American troops played a major role in the D-Day landings and that thousands lost their lives to liberate France. However, it is a sad day when a major European statesman, for his own political ends, deliberately understates the role played by the British and the Canadians.

Worst of all, it would seem that the British Government has contributed to the snub by the French President, by initially stating that the 65th anniversary was not sufficiently significant to support properly and then backtracking furiously to ensure that a member of the Royal family was invited after the public furore surrounding the Queen’s omission from the invitation list.

In doing so, our politicians have unwittingly acquiesced to the rewriting of history by Hollywood and by European politicians who are more than happy to downplay the role played by British troops.

The facts, of course, paint a different picture.

Whilst two of the five landing beaches were American (Omaha and Utah), the other three beaches, namely Gold, Juno and Sword, were allocated to the British Second Army (which included the Canadian 3rd Division). The five non-American divisions (four British and one Canadian) also contributed more troops to the campaign than the five American divisions which took part.

Significantly, the critical support needed to ensure that the landings were successful came mainly from British forces, including reconnaissance by commandoes of the beaches and landing sites, the bombing of strategic targets by the RAF, and the attacking of German ships in the English Channel by the Royal Navy. Finally, and most importantly, both the Royal Navy and the Merchant Navy supplied the ships which carried the invasion force over to France, including those to the American landing sites.

Indeed, my own grandfather served on the SS Amsterdam which supported the D-Day landings on Omaha beach by being one of the ships which delivered the landing crafts and their American troops to the coast (see picture above).

Once that task was completed, the SS Amsterdam was refitted as a hospital ship to be able to take the thousands of wounded out of France and back to Southampton for treatment.

However, on August 7th 1944, on the way back to Britain with a full load of wounded troops, the ship struck a mine and went down in under 8 minutes with the loss of 106 lives, including that of my grandfather. Here is an account of its sinking by one of its young crew, which I only discovered last week.

Whilst President Sarkozy should hang his head in shame for turning this moving ceremony into a roadshow for his own personal political benefit, our own Government, allegedly so complicit by doing nothing to deal with this diplomatic gaffe, must now ensure that it never happens again, and ensure that every future remembrance ceremony must include our Head of State to represent those who gave so much to ensure the freedom of Europe.

The thousands of British servicemen and merchant seamen who died during the summer of 1944 in securing those beaches deserve no less.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I have read the link as to how your grandfather's ship was blown up. It must have been terrible for your family. It is stories like this that people should read when they easily forget the sacrifices millions made to defeat fascism. Would they vote for nazis such as BNP if they did?

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

THE MANUFACTURING STRATEGY FOR WALES

Last night, I received the following comment on the previous post relating to a piece I had written back in early 2007 about the state of the manufacturing sector in Wales. "Dylan, you seem to be ignoring the fact that manufacturers in Wales have written the manufacturing strategy. Small and large manufacturers, all represented at the Manufacturing forum, have co-written this strategy. WAG has recently supported this strategy and have funded a co-ordinator with resources. Manufactures are happy with this progress as they are following the strategy they wanted. I know that the Conservatives have attacked the strategy as they seem to think that WAG wrote the strategy. They couldn't be more wrong. The Manufacturing Strategy was written by manufacturers, for manufacturers and is supported by WAG. If you don't agree with this, then I can invite you to the next Manufacturing Forum and you can explain to the manufacturers how their strategy is wrong....I appreciate that there is

INTRAPRENEURSHIP

Whilst we often consider entrepreneurship to be associated predominantly with new start-ups, larger firms - in order to compete effectively in fast-changing global markets - are adopting more innovative and enterprising approaches to management within their organisations. One of these approaches is the development of entrepreneurship within a corporate environment (or intrapreneurship). Research has shown that intrapreneurship is not easy, and there are considerable differences between an intrapreneurial and a traditional corporate culture, with the latter having an emphasis on a culture and reward system that tends to favour caution in decision-making. For example, large businesses rarely operate on a "gut-feeling" for the market-place, as many entrepreneurs do. Instead, large amounts of data are gathered before any major business decision is made, not only for use in rational business decisions, but also for use as justification if the decision does not produce optimu