Skip to main content

A QUESTION OF PRIORITIES

Three weeks ago, this column pointed out that Anglesey remains the poorest county in the whole of the UK and suggested that the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) should adopt an exceptional approach in dealing with such an exceptional situation.

I went on to propose that £100 million of European funds should be given to Anglesey over the next five years and that WAG should match that directly from its economic development budget.

Since then, I am glad that the local authority has taken up this call for ‘special status’ for the island and has directly approached WAG for financial aid.

Given this situation, many on the island would have been astounded that, on the same day that Anglesey Aluminium closed its doors, WAG was providing tens of millions of pounds for regeneration in another part of Wales.

Last Wednesday, a £38 million project to transform and revitalise Swansea's city centre and its waterfront was approved for funding by the Assembly. This follows the approval for other European funded projects in the city including £100 million for a range of initiatives at Swansea University, an £11 million scheme to replace the existing bus station, £6 million towards a new office development and £6 million towards supporting vulnerable adults in Swansea Bay.

Clearly, Swansea has made the most of the opportunities presented to it by European funding and good luck to those who have developed those projects.


Despite this, the question needs to be asked as to why £160 million has been given to Wales’ second city (seen above) when its poorest county has received just £5 million of European funds for one specific project?

That question becomes even more pertinent when you compare the relative prosperity of each county.

Anglesey is the poorest county in the whole of Britain, with an average prosperity of 56 per cent of the UK average. In contrast, Swansea’s wealth is at 81 per cent of the UK average, which means it wouldn’t even qualify under normal European rules for funding if it was considered as a county alone. However, because of the way we define our regions in Wales, Swansea benefits financially because it is grouped with other much poorer Welsh areas.

This has led to a situation where Anglesey County Council now has to go cap in hand to an Assembly Government that had no hesitation whatsoever in approving £160 million of funding to another more prosperous county that would not even meet the criteria for European support on its own.

As a gog born and bred, I find such a situation intolerable and make no apologies for demanding that North Wales is treated equitably when it comes to supporting wealth and employment creation.

Papers such as the Daily Post has pointed out, on numerous occasions, that there have long been suspicions that South Wales is given preference when it comes to support from politicians and policymakers in Cardiff Bay. This latest and unwarranted bias in the granting of European funds demonstrates that, at best, there is little appreciation or understanding of the problems facing the North Wales economy.

It is completely unacceptable that the poorest parts of this region are being short-changed when there seems to be no hesitation in approving hundreds of millions of pounds of spending for the rest of Wales.

The time has come for all of us to unequivocally demand that our elected representatives, from all the political parties wake up to this reality and do everything in their power to make sure that enough is enough. When it comes to economic and political support within both Westminster and Cardiff Bay, North Wales deserves ‘chwarae teg’.

Comments

Pelagius said…
Not another silly 'North Wales' story, please. Tell me where 'North' ends and 'South' starts? Do you mean to say that Glamorgan gets all the goodies while Deeside gets nothing? Is Barry Island better treated than Llandudno?

I agree totally that poverty and lack of economic development in too many parts of Wales is a serious problem but to divide Wales along these false lines just detracts from the soundness of your argument.

The Daily Post would because that's their circulation area. I wish they were more national as it is a much better paper than the Western Mail.
Anonymous said…
I'm a "hwntw" so forgive me Professor if I'm generalising a little....

What could Ynys Mon realistically do with £100m?

There are no built up areas to focus on (except perhaps around the Menai), the population is small (Bridgend and it's environs probably has an equal, if not larger population) so even small numbers of job losses will have a greater impact, statistically, than more populated areas in the South and North East. Also there are ongoing problems with the local authority.

What industries could Ynys Mon seed, grow and develop a niche in?

Is there a case for a "North Wales" EU region? I certainly believe so.

Living in an Objective One area, from my experience much of the money has been used for public realm improvements and social programmes. These schemes have their place of course but progress has been sluggish on developing the infrastructure and innovation needed to generate real wealth.

I fear Ynys Mon would end up falling into this "cycle".

It looks like Swansea has the right balance though.
treforus said…
Swansea and South West Wales has not had fair play for years.When,at long last,some investment comes our way ,a don from Cardiff says that it's all wrong.Billions upon billions have been poured into grandiose prestige projects in SE Wales.If you want to see where the money has been misspent,look around there.

Or is that too close to home?
Hogyn o Fon said…
You seemed to have stirred up the hwntws, professor.

If they could be bothered to read your article properly, you are not asking for North Wales to get any more, just to get its fair share. Thanks to Andrew Davies fighting his corner for Swansea and using his influence when economic development minister, the area has received hundreds of millions from European funding whilst Anglesey has had bugger all. Imagine if only a quarter of SA1 was in Holyhead what a difference it would make.

When Ebbw Vale Steel Works closed down, a small fortune was spent in regenerating the area whilst Ieu Bach has done nothing to bring money to his own constituency. By the way – the populations of Blaenau Gwent and the island of my birth are the same.

The same is true of other projects – the South gets an Opera House, a stadium a Botanic Garden and a Coastal park from the Millennium Commission and what do we gogs get, a bloody choo choo train from Caernarfon to Beddgelert!

The North has always had a bum deal – end of.
Pelagius said…
Hogyn o Fôn, if you knew your country, you would understand that the Millennium Centre is in Cardiff, the capital city. Perhaps you'd prefer it built in Liverpool instead? It's the National Botanic Garden in Caerfyrddin. Like the National Library in Aberystwyth, the National Slate Museum in Llanberis, the National Mountain Centre in Capel Curig. Plus Hafod Eryri, Venue Cymru, Y Galeri, half the National Eisteddfod, etc.

Interesting that you should blame other Welsh people and not the British government for the sad state of Ynys Môn. Methinks you may be suffering from the Stockholm Syndrome.
Hogyn o Fon said…
“Know my country” – Pelagius your arrogance, hypocrisy and ignorance are outstanding. You really seem to think that all that money that has gone into South Wales will benefit North Wales. There is two hour gap from where North Wales ends and South Wales starts and there is a similar gap in thinking by politicians.

Your list of ‘national’ projects shows how little you know about the realpolitik of decisions regarding the location of lottery funding. The slate mine museum , Y Galeri, venue Cymru vs the Millennium Stadium, Millennium Centre and the Botanic Gardens. You have made my argument for me.

Pray tell me, as this is a 'silly' argument are you hoping that the 400 unemployed Anglesey Aluminium workers will hop on Ieuan Air or should they ‘get on their bikes’ and commute the four hours down to Swansea to get some jobs that will inevitably come from the millions being spent there.

Given your disdain for the British Government, you should have a chat with Adam Price, who seems to think that spreading the wealth throughout the UK from the South East of England is the right approach to economic policy. Why shouldn't be the same for Wales?

£160 million spent in Swansea; £5 million in Ynys Mon. That says everything about the priorities of the Assembly Government.
Barti Gwynn said…
It should be noted perhaps, that Anglesea is a remote, and thinly populated agrarian landscape, and has a population of around 70,000, whilst Swansea has almost 300,000.
Swansea is a densely populated metropolis, with two universities, two large hospitals and has cultural diversity, including five mosques!
A few years back, there was a surge in Welsh property sales, as more affluent workers from England began purchasing holiday homes, which soon became the focus of much protest, some of which in the West and North, culminated in arson attacks on English owned properties.
There were some attacks too in the South, but let`s be honest, the memories of that campaign, along with the issues of "Welsh language in the workplace" may still linger in the minds of some potential investors.

Popular posts from this blog

THE IMPORTANCE OF FRANCHISING

When we talk about start-ups and entrepreneurship, rarely do we discuss the potential of franchising not only as a way of establishing new ventures in the economy but also as a method of growing existing businesses. According to the British Franchising Association, franchising is the granting of a licence by one person (the franchisor) to another (the franchisee), which entitles the franchisee to own and operate their own business under the brand, systems and proven business model of the franchisor. The franchisee also receives initial training and ongoing support, comprising all the elements necessary to establish a previously untrained person in the business. This enables individuals to start their own businesses without having to develop their own ideas and utilising an existing brand and established market. Of course, whilst each franchise business is owned and operated by the franchisee, the franchisor controls the quality and standards of the way in which the business is

Change your business through change

All business organisations, especially entrepreneurial small firms, must cope with an ever changing business environment. However, small firms have a very limited ability in being able to control and relate to changes in the environment, although this can depend on the context of change. For example, if a major customer changes increases its order, the entrepreneur should be able to predict events and actions with regard to the timing and consequences of such a change and forecast any changes in the required resources and cashflow. Given this, the entrepreneur can undertake rational short-interval planning activity in order to underpin organisational control. However, much of the change facing business today is largely unpredictable in terms of its timing and its consequences. In other words, such change is open-ended, with it often being unclear what is changing or why it is changing. For example, the effect of the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Centre was largely unexpected and its

THE PERFECT STORM FACING THE UK ECONOMY

In his sublime 1997 book on the fate of the fishing boat Andrea Gale, the author Sebastian Junger defined a “perfect storm” as a rare combination of events or circumstances that results in an unusually bad situation.  This term would not be out of place in describing what is currently happening to the UK economy which is being battered on so many fronts with little respite in sight. For example, the war in Ukraine has had an unexpected impact on energy bills in Europe due to the curtailing of exports from Russia which, last year, was responsible for supplying 40% of all natural gas to the European Union. Whilst the UK is not dependent on Russia for its energy needs, the scramble by other countries to find alternative sources has resulted in higher prices globally which has impacted on the fuel imported by the UK with normal suppliers struggling to meet demand. There have also been considerable supply constraints globally which have been driven by manufacturers struggling to get their g